Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13600HX vs Intel Core i7-12700

Intel Core i5-13600HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600HX

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.8 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports vPro (Enterprise) management features.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13600HX as of August 2023, we have plenty of performance data for the i7-13650HX, a chip with almost the same specs (six P-cores mated to eight E-cores, with the latter running at the same clock speeds as what the 13600HX has and the former running at up to 100 MHz faster which is a very small difference). Based on that, we expect the 13600HX to be just a few percentage points behind the i7-13700HX and the i9-12950HX, meaning it's a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its peak Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its Intel-recommended Base power consumption is 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a noticeably higher value to get better performance.

The i5-13600HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-12700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12700

The Intel Core i7-12700F is a fast eight-core desktop processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, which was introduced in November 2021. The processor offers a base clock of 3.3 GHz and reaches up to 4.9 GHz in Turbo. In the same way, the Intel Core i7-12700K the Core i7-12700F is based on a hybrid architecture of 8P and 4E cores. The innovations of the Alder Lake-S processor compared to Rocket Lake, together with the smaller 10 nm manufacturing process, are clearly noticeable. The Intel Core i7-12700 does not offer a free multiplier, which means that overclocking is not possible.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-11700 , performance has been increased with a better IPC. The additional e-cores are also clearly noticeable in multi-threaded applications. Overall, this provides a noticeable performance boost, which also has an effect on all application areas. The 4 E-Cores provide the P-Cores with significantly more power. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0can increase the clock rate of the P-Cores to up to 4.9 GHz. The E-cores also offer a turbo and clock up to 3.6 GHz.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i7-12700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. However, with the Intel UHD Graphics 770 there is only a simple iGPU which is only suitable for office use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-12700 is 65 watts, with the option to consume up to 180 watts in Turbo mode. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be achieved permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelIntel Core i5-13600HXIntel Core i7-12700
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Alder Lake-S
CodenameRaptor Lake-HXAlder Lake
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 « 3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock1900 - 4800 MHz3300 - 4900 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB25 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2012 / 20
TDP55 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.de
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB
$349 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-12700
47 pt (65%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21751 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1894 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
731 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8338 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3151 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
272 Points (82%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9171 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60892 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
103354 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15091 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
272.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9328 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
78331 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6292 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
172.4 fps (60%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
347 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.5 fps (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
242 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
151 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15390 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
400.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
72464 Points (63%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86815 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86587 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96264 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23193 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
34681 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16400 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2920 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15910 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1885     avg: 1913     median: 1912.5 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
1924 Points (81%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14280     avg: 15135     median: 15135 (27%)     max: 15990 Points
14961 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1845 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14883 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8059 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52676 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
508 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
268 Points (77%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
314 Points (65%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2016 Points (77%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
327 Watt (56%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
284 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (55%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600HX → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12700 → 100% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 23:39:39

#0 checking url part for id 14675 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14995 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720042779 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14675 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 14675 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14995 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14995 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.043s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)