Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13500H vs Intel Core i5-10400H vs Intel Core i9-10980HK

Intel Core i5-13500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13500H

The Intel Core i5-13500H is a mid-range mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake or Raptor Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 4 of the 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and all 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 16 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 4.7 GHz (single core boost, all core up to 4.6 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 3.5 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 18 MB L3 cache. 

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speeds of the improved Intel 7 process, the Core i5-13500H can surpass the old Core i5-12600H (e.g., + 200 MHz boost).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from DDR5-4800 of the i5-12500H). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units).

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (95 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a further improved 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

Intel Core i5-10400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400H

The Intel Core i5-10400H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (up to 4.4 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10400H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance should be slightly better than the old Core i7-8809G (Quad-Core 3.1 - 4.2) which was the fastest mobile quad core by Intel.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i9-10980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10980HK

The Intel Core i9-10980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz (all 8 cores up to 4.4 GHz) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 65°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost), between 65 and 85°C, 5.2 GHz are the maximum and above that 5.1 with restrictions (Turbo Boost 3.0).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9980HK, the 10980HK probably offers only increased base clock rates (and maybe multi core turbo clocks). Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10750H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the similar (and later released) Core i9-10885H (2.4 - 5.3 GHz).

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10980HK should be higher than the old Core i9-9980HK (2.4 - 5 GHz) thanks to the increased turbo clock speeds. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10980HK is the fastest Comet Lake-H CPU and fastest laptop CPU on the market. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9980HK. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early information.

ModelIntel Core i5-13500HIntel Core i5-10400HIntel Core i9-10980HK
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameRaptor Lake-HComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H « 1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H « 2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1900 - 4700 MHz2600 - 4600 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache1.1 MB256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache10 MB1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache18 MB8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 164 / 88 / 16
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1744FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesThread DirectorDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$583 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500H
41.6 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400H
31.8 pt (44%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10980HK
36.4 pt (50%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
106 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
706 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13542     avg: 14426     median: 14081 (13%)     max: 16335 Points
min: 9597     avg: 10605     median: 10590.5 (10%)     max: 11641 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1704     avg: 1755     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1799 Points
min: 1228     avg: 1277     median: 1287 (55%)     max: 1305 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 655     avg: 674     median: 684 (76%)     max: 687 Points
471 Points (52%)
min: 465     avg: 488.2     median: 489 (54%)     max: 507 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5108     avg: 5491     median: 5345 (13%)     max: 6212 Points
1924 Points (5%)
min: 3526     avg: 3933     median: 3883 (9%)     max: 4487 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2234     avg: 2317     median: 2304 (15%)     max: 2475 Points
796 Points (5%)
min: 1606     avg: 1739     median: 1737 (11%)     max: 1862 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 243     avg: 251.2     median: 249 (75%)     max: 261 Points
192 Points (58%)
min: 198     avg: 206.7     median: 206 (62%)     max: 219 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.3 Points (37%)
9.6 Points (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
2.2 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9664 Points (58%)
7403 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
53786 Points (39%)
25731 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
85169 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14421 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
225.4 s (3%)
801 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
24.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7325 Points (12%)
4115 Points (7%)
6869 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 50846     avg: 53945     median: 52458.5 (30%)     max: 58567 MIPS
23136 MIPS (13%)
min: 43786     avg: 47126     median: 47455 (27%)     max: 49275 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5500     avg: 5643     median: 5629.5 (67%)     max: 5885 MIPS
4766 MIPS (57%)
min: 5081     avg: 5386     median: 5437 (65%)     max: 5542 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
132.2 fps (46%)
49.1 fps (17%)
98.2 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
336 fps (78%)
191.4 fps (44%)
238.5 fps (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.4     avg: 15.8     median: 15.3 (27%)     max: 17.9 fps
6.1 fps (11%)
min: 12     avg: 13     median: 13 (23%)     max: 14.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
0.9 GB/s (16%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.3 GB/s (35%)
5.3 GB/s (14%)
10.1 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 348     avg: 420.7     median: 440 (6%)     max: 467 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 205     avg: 239.5     median: 249 (2%)     max: 263 Seconds
565 Seconds (4%)
min: 239     avg: 277.4     median: 279 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.471     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.51 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.561     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 14422     avg: 14694     median: 14693.5 (31%)     max: 14965 Points
9578 Points (20%)
min: 13573     avg: 13765     median: 13765 (29%)     max: 13957 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
8.1 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.8 s (1%)
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
340.4 s (2%)
484.5 s (2%)
449 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 66694     avg: 69407     median: 69406.5 (61%)     max: 72119 Points
min: 54332     avg: 56780     median: 56779.5 (50%)     max: 59227 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17243     avg: 20166     median: 20615 (56%)     max: 22256 Points
8007 Points (22%)
min: 13629     avg: 16455     median: 16268 (44%)     max: 19000 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 83891     avg: 98008     median: 99920 (81%)     max: 108302 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84329     avg: 97198     median: 102831 (83%)     max: 104433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84249     avg: 95037     median: 97144 (82%)     max: 103719 Points
67714 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16441     avg: 17953     median: 18052.5 (46%)     max: 19089 Points
min: 14150     avg: 15807     median: 16163 (41%)     max: 17016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24079     avg: 26241     median: 26543 (47%)     max: 28238 Points
min: 19789     avg: 21270     median: 21190.5 (38%)     max: 22476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8534     avg: 10789     median: 11151 (47%)     max: 11937 Points
min: 8448     avg: 9352     median: 9439 (40%)     max: 10020 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2431     avg: 2454     median: 2446 (66%)     max: 2484 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10876     avg: 11628     median: 11828 (47%)     max: 12179 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1674     avg: 1733     median: 1743 (74%)     max: 1762 Points
1245 Points (53%)
min: 1283     avg: 1339     median: 1347.5 (57%)     max: 1401 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9312     avg: 10739     median: 11099 (20%)     max: 11465 Points
4332 Points (8%)
min: 7634     avg: 8175     median: 8155.5 (15%)     max: 8666 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1687     avg: 1709     median: 1708.5 (7%)     max: 1730 Points
min: 1222     avg: 1317     median: 1349 (6%)     max: 1380 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11309     avg: 11351     median: 11350.5 (36%)     max: 11392 Points
min: 7597     avg: 7969     median: 8010 (25%)     max: 8300 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7676     avg: 7707     median: 7706.5 (77%)     max: 7737 Points
min: 5615     avg: 5935     median: 5971 (60%)     max: 6218 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 42297     avg: 42656     median: 42655.5 (47%)     max: 43014 Points
min: 29927     avg: 31196     median: 30973 (34%)     max: 32688 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5687 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30205 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 517     avg: 529     median: 521 (1%)     max: 549 ms
787 ms (1%)
min: 722     avg: 748     median: 745 (1%)     max: 764 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
57793 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 234     avg: 244.7     median: 238 (68%)     max: 266 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 260     avg: 274.6     median: 273 (57%)     max: 307 Points
min: 232     avg: 242.9     median: 243 (51%)     max: 252 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1635     avg: 1820     median: 1794 (69%)     max: 1997 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 71     avg: 92.5     median: 77.1 (13%)     max: 162 Watt
67.4 Watt (12%)
min: 139     avg: 149.5     median: 149.5 (26%)     max: 160 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 92.7     avg: 124.1     median: 127.8 (23%)     max: 148 Watt
75.9 Watt (14%)
min: 147     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (31%)     max: 194 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 6.19     avg: 10.1     median: 10 (7%)     max: 13.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 9     avg: 14.1     median: 15.3 (17%)     max: 18 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.8     avg: 20.2     median: 20.8 (15%)     max: 24.1 Points per Watt
10.5 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 9.05     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500H → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400H → 62% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10980HK → 86% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 29. 17:17:26

#0 checking url part for id 14727 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11958 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11873 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719674246 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14727 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 14727 +0.014s ... 0.026s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11958 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#10 got single benchmarks 11958 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11873 +0.004s ... 0.037s

#12 got single benchmarks 11873 +0.017s ... 0.055s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.065s ... 0.12s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)