Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i5-13500 ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i5-13500 ist ein schneller und sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,8 GHz im Turbo. Die mit Alder-Lake eingeführte hybride CPU-Architektur kommt auch bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zum Einsatz. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500 bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 mehr Kerne, womit eine höhere Gesamtleistung erzielt werden kann. In Summe kann der Intel Core i5-13500 bis zu 20 Threads parallel verarbeiten. Die Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) bieten hierzu Hyperthreading, was den energieeffizienten Kernen (E-Cores) vorenthalten wird.
Performance
Aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physikalischen Recheneinheiten bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 spürbar mehr Leistung. Beide Prozessoren verfügen über 6 P-Kerne, wenngleich nur der Intel Core i5-13500 zusätzlich mit 8 E-Kernen bestückt ist.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Intel Core i5-12600K bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert.
Leistungsaufnahme
Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13500 beläuft sich auf 65 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 154 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 steigt der Energiebedarf etwas an.
Intel Core i9-13900K ► remove from comparison
The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.
Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4) , the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).
The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K .
Model Intel Core i5-13500 Intel Core i9-13900K Series Raptor Lake-S Intel Raptor Lake-S Codename Raptor Lake Raptor Lake Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz 24 / 32 36 MB L3 Intel Core i7-13700K 3.4 - 5.4 GHz 16 / 24 30 MB L3 Intel Core i5-13600K 3.5 - 5.1 GHz 14 / 20 24 MB L3 Intel Core i5-13500 2.5 - 4.8 GHz 14 / 20 24 MB L3 Intel Core i5-13500T 2.5 - 4.6 GHz 14 / 20 24 MB L3
Clock 2500 - 4800 MHz 3000 - 5800 MHz L2 Cache 11.5 MB 32 MB L3 Cache 24 MB 36 MB Cores / Threads 14 / 20 6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core 24 / 32 8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core 16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core TDP 65 Watt 125 Watt TDP Turbo PL2 154 Watt Technology 10 nm 10 nm Die Size 215 mm2 257 mm2 max. Temp. 100 °C 100 °C Socket LGA 1700 LGA 1700 Features Intel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s Intel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s iGPU Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer www.intel.de www.intel.com $589 U.S.
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500
42.6 pt (59%)
...
...
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
59.3 pt (82%)
...
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
822 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14573 Points (14%)
min: 32592 avg: 37310 median: 38271.5 (36%) max: 40103 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 36% 95% 81%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1780 Points (76%)
min: 2203 avg: 2238 median: 2238.5 (95%) max: 2272 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 79% 99% 97%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
685 Points (76%)
min: 828 avg: 849 median: 849.5 (94%) max: 870 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 80% 100% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5633 Points (14%)
min: 13415 avg: 14459 median: 14620.5 (36%) max: 15181 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 37% 96% 88%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2405 Points (15%)
min: 5321 avg: 5798 median: 5805.5 (37%) max: 6191 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 40% 100% 89%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
256 Points (77%)
min: 299 avg: 314.1 median: 318 (96%) max: 328 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 95% 79% 100% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.4 Points (37%)
min: 62.2 avg: 67 median: 67.5 (88%) max: 70.78 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 40% 95% 88%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
min: 3.8 avg: 3.9 median: 3.9 (96%) max: 3.93 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 79% 99% 97%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8875 Points (54%)
min: 11661 avg: 11989 median: 12017.5 (73%) max: 12259 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 73% 98% 97%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
49300 Points (36%)
min: 85342 avg: 88253 median: 87738 (64%) max: 92192 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 56% 100% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
79625 Points (55%)
min: 132000 avg: 134526 median: 133567 (93%) max: 138969 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 95% 57% 96% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14282 Points (17%)
min: 17418 avg: 17943 median: 17998.5 (22%) max: 18355 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 78% 98% 97%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100.7 s (1%)
min: 79.738 avg: 84.6 median: 84.2 (1%) max: 90.13 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4 s (1%)
min: 1.818 avg: 2.1 median: 2 (0%) max: 2.305 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
7704 Points (12%)
min: 13210 avg: 14265 median: 14271 (23%) max: 15309 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 52% 98% 89%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
55528 MIPS (32%)
min: 127201 avg: 142777 median: 146984 (84%) max: 148053 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 38% 100% 86%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5887 MIPS (70%)
min: 7176 avg: 7343 median: 7272 (87%) max: 7539 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 80% 100% 98%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
134.6 fps (47%)
min: 247.5 avg: 261.5 median: 264.8 (92%) max: 269 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 50% 100% 93%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
306 fps (71%)
min: 412 avg: 419 median: 419.3 (97%) max: 425.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 72% 100% 98%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
min: 34.5 avg: 39.9 median: 40.7 (72%) max: 42.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 38% 96% 81%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 2.6 avg: 2.9 median: 2.9 (0%) max: 3 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 43% 97% 87%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.3 GB/s (40%)
min: 5.2 avg: 5.4 median: 5.4 (93%) max: 5.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 43% 100% 96%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12 GB/s (31%)
min: 20.5 avg: 23.3 median: 22.9 (60%) max: 27 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 44% 85% 76%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
399 Seconds (5%)
min: 136 avg: 145.2 median: 140.5 (2%) max: 174 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 103% 100% 103% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
223 Seconds (2%)
min: 80 avg: 85.7 median: 84 (1%) max: 101 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 101% 100% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.3468 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (8%) max: 0.3911 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 102% 100% 102% 101%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14875 Points (32%)
min: 19989 avg: 20578 median: 20192 (43%) max: 21934 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 71% 97% 96%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
min: 5.655 avg: 5.7 median: 5.7 (1%) max: 5.86 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
min: 12.287 avg: 12.6 median: 12.5 (1%) max: 13.193 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628 avg: 296.6 median: 293.3 (1%) max: 310.125 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
69725 Points (61%)
min: 86915 avg: 97290 median: 96473 (84%) max: 112434 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 65% 86% 81%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18026 Points (49%)
min: 29023 avg: 31289 median: 31187.5 (84%) max: 33181 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 57% 99% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84456 Points (69%)
min: 79257 avg: 97847 median: 97246.5 (79%) max: 111988 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 85% 91% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
83392 Points (68%)
min: 80320 avg: 96904 median: 97919.5 (79%) max: 102987 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 85% 93% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81778 Points (69%)
min: 83056 avg: 98634 median: 97311 (82%) max: 105981 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 81% 92% 93%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17891 Points (45%)
min: 26626 avg: 29034 median: 29044.5 (73%) max: 30955 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 61% 98% 91%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
26263 Points (47%)
min: 46013 avg: 51456 median: 51140 (91%) max: 54226 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 51% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9655 Points (41%)
min: 16236 avg: 20507 median: 20037 (84%) max: 22794 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 46% 95% 77%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2483 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10348 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1805 Points (76%)
min: 2106 avg: 2237 median: 2286 (96%) max: 2290 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 79% 99% 92%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10322 Points (18%)
min: 22448 avg: 23743 median: 24033 (43%) max: 24157 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 43% 100% 93%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1749 Points (8%)
min: 2148 avg: 2191 median: 2197 (10%) max: 2246 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 79% 99% 97%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10213 Points (32%)
min: 22024 avg: 23446 median: 23664 (75%) max: 24021 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 43% 99% 92%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7379 Points (74%)
min: 9218 avg: 9542 median: 9598 (96%) max: 9683 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 77% 100% 96%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39094 Points (43%)
min: 77347 avg: 84105 median: 85336 (94%) max: 86695 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 45% 99% 89%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
519 ms (1%)
min: 423 avg: 430.6 median: 432 (1%) max: 438 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 304 avg: 317.6 median: 316 (91%) max: 335 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 98% 79% 100% 94%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
266 Points (55%)
min: 338 avg: 364 median: 368 (77%) max: 382 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 97% 71% 100% 90%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1549 Points (59%)
min: 2263 avg: 2497 median: 2580 (99%) max: 2589 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 60% 98% 87%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98.7 Watt (17%)
min: 228 avg: 354.3 median: 359 (62%) max: 471 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 442% 203% 323%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121 Watt (22%)
min: 349 avg: 392.5 median: 370.5 (68%) max: 480 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 628% 261% 293%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.9 Watt (5%)
min: 41.8 avg: 91.7 median: 94.4 (62%) max: 138.2 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 100% 281% 134% 214%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.9 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 12.9 avg: 15 median: 15.2 (11%) max: 16.8 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 65 W TDP 125 W TDP 150 W 65% 100% 84% 76%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500 → 100% n=47 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 161% n=47
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 04. 17:10:54
#0 checking url part for id 17901 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s
#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105853 +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17901 +0.004s ... 0.007s
#7 got single benchmarks 17901 +0.005s ... 0.012s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.016s
#9 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.022s ... 0.037s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.095s
#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.098s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)