Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13500 vs Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Core i5-13500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i5-13500 ist ein schneller und sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,8 GHz im Turbo. Die mit Alder-Lake eingeführte hybride CPU-Architektur kommt auch bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zum Einsatz. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500 bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 mehr Kerne, womit eine höhere Gesamtleistung erzielt werden kann. In Summe kann der Intel Core i5-13500 bis zu 20 Threads parallel verarbeiten. Die Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) bieten hierzu Hyperthreading, was den energieeffizienten Kernen (E-Cores) vorenthalten wird.

Performance

Aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physikalischen Recheneinheiten bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 spürbar mehr Leistung. Beide Prozessoren verfügen über 6 P-Kerne, wenngleich nur der Intel Core i5-13500 zusätzlich mit 8 E-Kernen bestückt ist.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i5-12600K bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13500 beläuft sich auf 65 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 154 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 steigt der Energiebedarf etwas an.

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

ModelIntel Core i5-13500Intel Core i9-13900K
Series Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 « 2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4800 MHz3000 - 5800 MHz
L2 Cache11.5 MB32 MB
L3 Cache24 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2154 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.intel.com
$589 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500
42.6 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
59.3 pt (82%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
822 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14573 Points (14%)
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1780 Points (76%)
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
685 Points (76%)
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5633 Points (14%)
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2405 Points (15%)
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
256 Points (77%)
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (96%)     max: 328 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.4 Points (37%)
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (88%)     max: 70.78 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (96%)     max: 3.93 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8875 Points (54%)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
49300 Points (36%)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
79625 Points (55%)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (93%)     max: 138969 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14282 Points (17%)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100.7 s (1%)
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4 s (1%)
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7704 Points (12%)
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
55528 MIPS (32%)
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5887 MIPS (70%)
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (87%)     max: 7539 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
134.6 fps (47%)
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (92%)     max: 269 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
306 fps (71%)
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.3 GB/s (40%)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12 GB/s (31%)
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
399 Seconds (5%)
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
223 Seconds (2%)
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14875 Points (32%)
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
69725 Points (61%)
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (84%)     max: 112434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18026 Points (49%)
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (84%)     max: 33181 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84456 Points (69%)
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
83392 Points (68%)
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81778 Points (69%)
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (82%)     max: 105981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17891 Points (45%)
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
26263 Points (47%)
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9655 Points (41%)
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2483 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10348 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1805 Points (76%)
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (96%)     max: 2290 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10322 Points (18%)
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1749 Points (8%)
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10213 Points (32%)
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7379 Points (74%)
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39094 Points (43%)
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (94%)     max: 86695 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
519 ms (1%)
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (91%)     max: 335 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
266 Points (55%)
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (77%)     max: 382 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1549 Points (59%)
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (99%)     max: 2589 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98.7 Watt (17%)
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121 Watt (22%)
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.9 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500 → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 161% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:10:54

#0 checking url part for id 17901 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105853 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17901 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 17901 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.022s ... 0.037s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.058s ... 0.095s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.098s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)