Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-13600HX

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i5-13600HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600HX

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.8 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports vPro (Enterprise) management features.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13600HX as of August 2023, we have plenty of performance data for the i7-13650HX, a chip with almost the same specs (six P-cores mated to eight E-cores, with the latter running at the same clock speeds as what the 13600HX has and the former running at up to 100 MHz faster which is a very small difference). Based on that, we expect the 13600HX to be just a few percentage points behind the i7-13700HX and the i9-12950HX, meaning it's a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its peak Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its Intel-recommended Base power consumption is 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a noticeably higher value to get better performance.

The i5-13600HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i5-13600HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz1900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1614 / 20
TDP65 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1500 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2920 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15910 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
min: 1885     avg: 1913     median: 1912.5 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
min: 14280     avg: 15135     median: 15135 (27%)     max: 15990 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600HX → 116% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 16:53:52

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14675 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719932031 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14675 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 14675 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.044s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)