Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400F vs Intel Core i5-13450HX vs Intel Core i7-13850HX

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

Intel Core i5-13450HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13450HX

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 4 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.4 GHz (base) up to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.4 GHz. All cores can access the combined 20 MB L3 cache (compared to the 36 MB of the i9 models).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13450HX as of August 2023, we have tested several systems featuring the Core i5-12600K, a CPU with very similar specs (six P-cores mated to four E-cores, both running at insignificantly faster clock speeds than what the 13450HX has). Based on that, we expect the 13450HX to be 10% to 15% behind the Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the system's cooling solution is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its "base" power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The i5-13450HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13850HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13850HX

The Intel Core i7-13850HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and offers combined 20 cores and 28 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with Hyper-Threading and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The 13850HX supports the full enterprise set of vPro management features.

The eight P-Cores are clocked from 2.1 GHz (base) up to 5.3 GHz (single core boost, all cores up to 4.7 GHz). The twelfe E-Cores clock between 1.5 (base) and 3.8 GHz (boost).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13850HX).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13850HX as of August 2023, we fully expect the chip to be at least a couple pecentage points faster than the i9-12900HX, a CPU featuring eight P-cores and eight E-cores that run at nearly the same clock speeds as what the 13850HX has. Just how wide the performance delta will be will depend a lot on how competent the laptop's cooling solution is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Intel-recommended "Maximum Turbo" power consumption is 157 W while the Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

This Core i7 series processor is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-13400FIntel Core i5-13450HXIntel Core i7-13850HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor Lake-SRaptor Lake-HXRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i7-137002.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX « 1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz1800 - 4600 MHz1500 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB
L2 Cache9.5 MB24 MB
L3 Cache20 MB20 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1610 / 16
6 x 4.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
20 / 28
8 x 5.3 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 3.8 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700BGA1964BGA1964
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enter., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13450HX
42.6 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
16575 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
1766 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
672 Points (75%)
680 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6091 Points (15%)
6489 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2364 Points (15%)
2427 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (76%)
251 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.5 Points (36%)
29.2 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8689 Points (52%)
9840 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51113 Points (37%)
58749 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82988 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
367.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8602 Points (14%)
6830 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
60048 MIPS (34%)
61811 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5743 MIPS (69%)
5571 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
136.9 fps (48%)
141.7 fps (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
314.5 fps (73%)
324.6 fps (75%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.2 fps (34%)
16.9 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.2 GB/s (32%)
13.5 GB/s (35%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
387 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
196 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
14017 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
15.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
420.5 s (2%)
402 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23820 Points (64%)
21982 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
77765 Points (63%)
82893 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
76636 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
80273 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19846 Points (50%)
19916 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28087 Points (50%)
27595 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12669 Points (53%)
12644 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2448 Points (66%)
2700 Points (73%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
12619 Points (50%)
16782 Points (66%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1792 Points (76%)
1763 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12095 Points (22%)
12022 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43856 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7348 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
41034 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
531 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
294 Points (61%)
281 Points (59%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
214 Watt (37%)
min: 108.7     avg: 134.8     median: 134.8 (23%)     max: 160.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
184.2 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
min: 19.2     avg: 25.4     median: 25.4 (17%)     max: 31.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.5     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 18.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13450HX → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13850HX → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 30. 19:48:18

#0 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14673 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14677 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719769698 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14673 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 14673 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14677 +0.001s ... 0.024s

#12 got single benchmarks 14677 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.073s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)