Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A

Intel Core i5-13400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a top modern and fast desktop processor and belongs to the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz. It reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-13400 therefore offers 6 P-cores and 4 E-cores, which can process a total of up to 16 threads in parallel. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process (called "Intel 7"). The Intel Core i5-13400 does not have a freely selectable multiplier. The LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series serves as the basis. The Intel Core i5-13400 can be based on either a Raptor Lake or Alder Lake chip. Initially, however, Alder Lake chips will be supplied.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-12400, the IPC of the new Core i5-13400 has been increased slightly. Nevertheless, there are now also 4 e-cores, which support the processor in terms of multi-thread performance. This puts the Intel Core i5-13400 at the level of an Intel Core i5-12600K, which also offers a total of 16 threads.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit, but it is only suited for office use or very old and low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13400 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 148 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A

► remove from comparison Qualcomm S4 Pro APQ8064A

The Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A is a high-end SoC for Android smartphones and tablets, which was introduced in 2012. The chip integrates 4 CPU cores, which are based on the ARMv7-compatible, but by Qualcomm designed Krait architecture. This provides a much higher per-MHz performance than Cortex-A9 chips such as Nvidia's Tegra 3 or the Exynos 4412 from Samsung, but does not quite reach the performance of the Cortex-A15 (for example in the Tegra 4). The memory is accessed via 2 x 32 bit LPDDR2 at up to 533 MHz, which offers a bandwidth of 8.5 GB/s.

The APQ8064A integrates an Adreno 320 GPU by IMG, which clocks at 400 MHz and offers a performance of over 50 GFLOPS. Thus, the graphics unit is one of the fastest in the SoC market (early 2013) and is only surpassed by a few models such as the PowerVR SGX554MP4 in the iPad 4. Therefore, even the most demanding 3D games in high resolutions will run fluently (Sony Xperia Z with 1080p display).

Thanks to a dedicated decoder, the SoC can accelerate 1080p video playback up to a frame rate of 30 fps. 3D photos are possible up to a resolution of 20 megapixels. In addition, the chip also integrates a wireless module with Bluetooth 4.0 and WLAN 802.11ac/a/b/g/n. Produced by TSMC in 28 nm (LP), the power consumption should be around 4 watts (estimated, depending on the clock speed).

ModelIntel Core i5-13400Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameRaptor Lake-SARMv7
Series: Snapdragon ARMv7
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores ARMv7
Clock2500 - 4600 MHz1500 - 1700 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB32 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache20 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 164 / 4
TDP65 Watt
Technology10 nm28 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2LTE, HSPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, FM
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (300 - 1550 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400 MHz)
Architecturex86ARM
$221 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400
42.9 pt (60%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15953 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1786 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
688 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6135 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2358 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
257 Points (77%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.4 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8721 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51095 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
83214 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14142 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
452.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7979 Points (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
59510 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5829 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
135.8 fps (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
311 fps (72%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.1 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.8 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13632 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
427.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79573 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23120 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
83302 Points (68%)
min: 4672     avg: 8626     median: 9782.5 (8%)     max: 10777 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82671 Points (67%)
min: 5909     avg: 8379     median: 8764.5 (7%)     max: 10508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
89999 Points (76%)
11099 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19608 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27135 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12948 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1795 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12107 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11801 Points (37%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7683 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42509 Points (47%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1304     avg: 1473     median: 1473 (3%)     max: 1642 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 485     avg: 498     median: 498 (10%)     max: 511 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
535 ms (1%)
min: 14529     avg: 14855     median: 14854.5 (17%)     max: 15180 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 854     avg: 1378     median: 1337 (15%)     max: 2012 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2223 Points (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
251 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
306 Points (64%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
723 Points (19%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1230 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1580 Points (21%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4552     avg: 7055     median: 7541 (17%)     max: 8142 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 6086     avg: 7440     median: 7290 (47%)     max: 8596 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
20270 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
25095 Points (25%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 144     avg: 321.5     median: 345 (11%)     max: 452 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8393     avg: 9636     median: 9432.5 (31%)     max: 11286 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8536     avg: 10282     median: 10517.5 (1%)     max: 11558 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2735 Points (14%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1877 Points (72%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
229 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
196.6 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
82.8 Watt (92%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A → 29% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 22:20:44

#0 checking url part for id 14996 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3645 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719865243 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14996 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 14996 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3645 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 3645 +0.008s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.066s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)