Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1334U vs Intel Atom x7-Z8700

Intel Core i5-1334U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1334U

The Intel Core i5-1334U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-U / RPL-U series). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.6 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.4 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the similar clock speed, the Core i5-1334U is very similar to the older Core i7-1250U (+100 MHz P-Cores base clock rate). The faster i7 like the i7-1365U models offer only higher clock rates (and a faster iGPU). Compared to the similar i5-1335U, the 1334U only supports slower LPDDR5-5200 (vs 6400 of the faster models) and is therefore slightly slower.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i5 CPU is rated at a TDP of 15W (base power, PL1) and a maximum turbo power of 55W (PL2). The RPL-U processors are built in a further improved Intel 7 process (10nm SuperFin) that allows higher clock rates.

Intel Atom x7-Z8700

► remove from comparison Intel Z8700

The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom Z3795, the Atom x7-Z8700 offers about 5 percent more performance and is similar fast as an AMD A6-6210 APU or high-end ARM SoCs, e.g. the Snapdragon 810 or Exynos 7420.

Using Windows, the performance is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance somewhere between the Qualcomm Adreno 330 / PowerVR G6430 and the Adreno 420 / PowerVR GX6450.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Core i5-1334UIntel Atom x7-Z8700
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-UIntel Atom x7
CodenameRaptor Lake-UCherry Trail
Series: Atom x7 Cherry Trail
Intel Core i7-1365U compare1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U « 0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U compare0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U compare1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 compare1.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock900 - 4600 MHz1600 - 2400 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 124 / 4
TDP15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1700
FeaturesThread DirectorIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 2x PCIe 2.0
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1250 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 98     avg: 116     median: 116 (1%)     max: 134 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 37     avg: 37.5     median: 37.5 (11%)     max: 38 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.72     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.36     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1003     avg: 1114     median: 1114 (7%)     max: 1225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1876     avg: 3116     median: 3116 (2%)     max: 4356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
2458 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
1311 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8700 +
24.5 s (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z8700 +
10.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z8700 +
50.8 fps (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z8700 +
49.8 s (11%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z8700 +
96.7 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 493     avg: 1186     median: 1186 (3%)     max: 1879 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z8700 +
2570 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z8700 +
237 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3300 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
970 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3350 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
990 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z8700 +
2675 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z8700 +
2440 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z8700 +
3867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z8700 +
3767 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
3427 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8700 +
4370 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8700 +
348.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
8408 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8700 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 16:33:48

#0 checking url part for id 14918 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6670 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719758028 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14918 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 14918 +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6670 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 6670 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.027s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)