Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i7-13650HX

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13650HX

The Intel Core i5-13650HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with Hyper-Threading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.9 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

The average 13650HX in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-13700HX and the Core i9-12950HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

The CPU is still produced on a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i7-13650HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameAlder LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX « 1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz1900 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1614 / 20
TDP125 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
44.9 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13650HX
46 pt (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 107.2     avg: 109.6     median: 109.6 (76%)     max: 111.9 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 805     avg: 991     median: 990.5 (18%)     max: 1176 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
min: 18879     avg: 20359     median: 20774.5 (19%)     max: 21006 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (81%)
min: 1813     avg: 1858     median: 1857.5 (79%)     max: 1903 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (82%)
min: 700     avg: 715     median: 716 (80%)     max: 728 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
min: 7197     avg: 7760     median: 7910 (19%)     max: 8021 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
min: 2864     avg: 3041     median: 3075.5 (19%)     max: 3147 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (83%)
min: 256     avg: 268.3     median: 271 (82%)     max: 275 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
37.4 Points (49%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
10616 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
68755 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
8422 Points (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
min: 73927     avg: 77006     median: 77020 (44%)     max: 80057 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (71%)
min: 5828     avg: 5934     median: 5891 (70%)     max: 6125 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (52%)
175.1 fps (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (77%)
345.8 fps (80%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
min: 18.9     avg: 21.3     median: 21.4 (38%)     max: 23.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
2.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
16.7 GB/s (43%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 272     avg: 308.5     median: 280.5 (4%)     max: 401 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
min: 158     avg: 178.5     median: 165 (1%)     max: 226 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4217     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4407 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
16051 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
14.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
370.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (68%)
min: 21967     avg: 23883     median: 24468.5 (66%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
90187 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
89359 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (65%)
92195 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
min: 21558     avg: 21733     median: 21744 (55%)     max: 21896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
min: 27723     avg: 31118     median: 31955.5 (57%)     max: 32839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
min: 13526     avg: 14070     median: 14032 (59%)     max: 14690 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2505     avg: 2534     median: 2533.5 (68%)     max: 2562 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 13554     avg: 13633     median: 13632.5 (54%)     max: 13711 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (80%)
min: 1810     avg: 1842     median: 1845 (78%)     max: 1866 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
min: 12509     avg: 13584     median: 13729.5 (25%)     max: 14367 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
1795 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
12356 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
7895 Points (79%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (51%)
52742 Points (58%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
min: 502     avg: 506     median: 507 (1%)     max: 511 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94168 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 260     avg: 272.5     median: 276.5 (79%)     max: 277 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (61%)
min: 268     avg: 297     median: 302 (63%)     max: 312 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (63%)
min: 1839     avg: 1877     median: 1842 (71%)     max: 1951 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
min: 100.9     avg: 151.5     median: 161.9 (28%)     max: 181.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
min: 158     avg: 180.7     median: 181 (33%)     max: 203 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16.7     avg: 21.8     median: 20.4 (13%)     max: 29.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 13.1     avg: 14     median: 14 (16%)     max: 15 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 15.5     avg: 17.3     median: 16.7 (12%)     max: 19.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13650HX → 108% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 00:03:38

#0 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14669 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720044218 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14669 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14669 +0.009s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.076s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.078s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)