Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i5-13600HX

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-13600HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600HX

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.8 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports vPro (Enterprise) management features.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13600HX as of August 2023, we have plenty of performance data for the i7-13650HX, a chip with almost the same specs (six P-cores mated to eight E-cores, with the latter running at the same clock speeds as what the 13600HX has and the former running at up to 100 MHz faster which is a very small difference). Based on that, we expect the 13600HX to be just a few percentage points behind the i7-13700HX and the i9-12950HX, meaning it's a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its peak Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its Intel-recommended Base power consumption is 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a noticeably higher value to get better performance.

The i5-13600HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i5-13600HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameAlder LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz1900 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1614 / 20
TDP125 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
44.9 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (81%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (82%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (83%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (52%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2920 Points (79%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15910 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (80%)
min: 1885     avg: 1913     median: 1912.5 (81%)     max: 1940 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
min: 14280     avg: 15135     median: 15135 (27%)     max: 15990 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (61%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600HX → 109% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 19:28:55

#0 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14675 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719682134 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14675 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 14675 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.041s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.044s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)