Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i5-13500HX

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-13500HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13500HX

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without Hyper-Threading. The P-Cores clock between 2.5 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. All cores can access the combined 24 MB L3 cache.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

The average 13500HX in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i7-13705H, Core i9-12900HK, Core i9-13900H, Core i9-13905H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption is 157 W and the Base power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will go for a value much higher than 55 W to get better performance.

The i5-13500HX is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i5-13500HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameAlder LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX « 1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz1800 - 4700 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1614 / 20
TDP125 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
44.9 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500HX
43.9 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
887 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
min: 18235     avg: 18582     median: 18334 (17%)     max: 19176 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (81%)
min: 1689     avg: 1731     median: 1730.5 (74%)     max: 1772 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (82%)
min: 648     avg: 674     median: 679 (75%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
min: 6978     avg: 7123     median: 7021 (17%)     max: 7371 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
min: 2856     avg: 2894     median: 2863 (18%)     max: 2964 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (83%)
min: 242     avg: 252.3     median: 252 (76%)     max: 263 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
33.7 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
3.1 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
8980 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
58608 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
400.2 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
10.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
min: 68923     avg: 71289     median: 71243 (41%)     max: 73701 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (71%)
min: 5377     avg: 5652     median: 5728 (68%)     max: 5850 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (52%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
min: 20.3     avg: 20.5     median: 20.3 (36%)     max: 20.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
14.6 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 310     avg: 328.3     median: 336 (4%)     max: 339 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
min: 178     avg: 188     median: 193 (1%)     max: 193 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4512     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4891 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
min: 13265     avg: 14596     median: 14596 (31%)     max: 15927 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
408 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (75%)
78386 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (68%)
min: 22848     avg: 23667     median: 23435 (63%)     max: 24719 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
101155 Points (82%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
min: 20276     avg: 20751     median: 20750.5 (52%)     max: 21225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
min: 28766     avg: 30450     median: 30600 (55%)     max: 31983 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
min: 12867     avg: 13931     median: 14159 (60%)     max: 14766 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2478 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
13404 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (80%)
min: 1688     avg: 1732     median: 1730 (73%)     max: 1779 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
min: 12683     avg: 13344     median: 13581 (24%)     max: 13767 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
min: 521     avg: 539     median: 547 (1%)     max: 550 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
90065 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 240     avg: 246.7     median: 243 (70%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (61%)
min: 255     avg: 280.7     median: 293 (61%)     max: 294 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (63%)
min: 1701     avg: 1833     median: 1832.5 (70%)     max: 1964 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
min: 128.6     avg: 132     median: 132 (23%)     max: 135.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
179.2 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (12%)     max: 18.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
13.4 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500HX → 102% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 19:34:56

#0 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14667 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719682496 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14667 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 14667 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.077s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)