Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1235U vs Intel Core i7-10810U

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10810U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10810U

The Intel Core i7-10810U is a power efficient hexa-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and appeared in March 2020. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model. The processor cores are clocked between 1.1 and 4.9 GHz. Thanks to HyperThreading 12 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The CPU supports professional management features vPro (as a difference to the i7-10710U).

Thanks to the two additional cores and the high clock rates, the processor performance of the i7-10710U is very good for its class. It should outperform the top Whiskey Lake and also Ice Lake processors if the cooling and TDP settings are not limiting.

The integrated graphics card however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

The chip is still produced on the 14nm++ process as Whiskey Lake. The TDP (PL1) is specified at 15 Watts but can be varied from 12.5 to 25 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). To provide the full performance, Intel proposes a short power peak of 90 W (PL4) for the i7 and therefore 8 W more than the quad-core CML-U CPUs and a whopping 19 W more than Whiskey Lake. Therefore, some slim laptops with 15W CML-U CPUs wont offer the i7 as they cant provide enough power and cooling to get full performance out of the 6 cores.

ModelIntel Core i5-1235UIntel Core i7-10810U
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-MIntel Comet Lake
CodenameAlder Lake-UComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U « 1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U compare1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U compare1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U compare2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock900 - 4400 MHz1100 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB256 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 126 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHALPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
36 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10810U
30.3 pt (42%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
93 Points (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
406 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
min: 3867     avg: 4311     median: 4310.5 (4%)     max: 4754 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (68%)     max: 1698 Points
min: 1082     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (48%)     max: 1155 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (69%)     max: 651 Points
min: 396     avg: 425.2     median: 424 (47%)     max: 447 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
min: 1498     avg: 1778     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 2344 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
min: 623     avg: 799     median: 754 (5%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (66%)     max: 242.3 Points
min: 161     avg: 175.6     median: 182 (55%)     max: 183 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6656     avg: 6927     median: 6926.5 (42%)     max: 7197 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 18912     avg: 19287     median: 19286.5 (14%)     max: 19661 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
23491 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8591 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 205.3     avg: 236.3     median: 236.3 (3%)     max: 267.369 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.856     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 6.952 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4747     avg: 4837     median: 4837 (8%)     max: 4927 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
min: 16072     avg: 21290     median: 21925 (13%)     max: 25244 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
min: 4398     avg: 4561     median: 4498 (54%)     max: 4794 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 39.15     avg: 39.4     median: 39.4 (14%)     max: 39.7 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 141.6     avg: 147.7     median: 147.7 (34%)     max: 153.7 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
min: 3.81     avg: 5.3     median: 5.2 (9%)     max: 6.45 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.566     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.64 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.956     avg: 1     median: 1 (17%)     max: 1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.5     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (15%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
1346 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
min: 571     avg: 689     median: 694 (5%)     max: 875 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.651     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.717 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6496     avg: 6843     median: 6842.5 (15%)     max: 7189 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.795     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.155 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.9     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 18.167 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 476.3     avg: 511     median: 510.9 (2%)     max: 545.435 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25128 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (28%)     max: 15604 Points
min: 6537     avg: 8591     median: 8534 (23%)     max: 10599 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
67708 Points (55%)
43938 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
44043 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
51608 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
min: 6231     avg: 7704     median: 7279 (18%)     max: 10034 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
min: 9003     avg: 10590     median: 10730 (19%)     max: 11864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
min: 2331     avg: 3331     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 4127 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (56%)     max: 2208 Points
1563 Points (42%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
4090 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (67%)     max: 1643 Points
min: 1219     avg: 1240     median: 1226 (52%)     max: 1274 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
min: 3351     avg: 4350     median: 3934 (7%)     max: 5553 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
min: 1220     avg: 1229     median: 1233 (5%)     max: 1235 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
min: 3924     avg: 4908     median: 5168 (16%)     max: 5631 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4762     avg: 5082     median: 5203 (52%)     max: 5281 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19324     avg: 21447     median: 22485 (25%)     max: 22533 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
min: 853     avg: 901     median: 914 (1%)     max: 968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (69%)     max: 83104 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (65%)     max: 236 Points
161.3 Points (46%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (52%)     max: 305 Points
min: 202     avg: 205.2     median: 206 (43%)     max: 207 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (16%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (53%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (55%)     max: 1644 Points
1018 Points (39%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
min: 29.1     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 64.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
min: 32.6     avg: 53.9     median: 53.9 (10%)     max: 75.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
5.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 7.17 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt
14.2 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10810U → 75% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 00:30:36

#0 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11935 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720045836 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11935 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 11935 +0.009s ... 0.024s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.062s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)