Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1235U vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Intel Core i5-1235U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1235U

The Intel Core i5-1235U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.3 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.9 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i5-1245U, the 1235U offers lower base clock speeds and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1235U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U and also, surprisingly enough, the i7-1250U and the i7-1260U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very respectable result, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 27 W, the Beelink SEi12 is among the fastest systems built around the 1235U that we know of. It can be twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

Power consumption

This ULV processor has a Base power consumption of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit), with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. Both values are too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Core i5-1235U is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core i5-1235UIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-MIntel Meteor Lake-H
CodenameAlder Lake-UMeteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U « 0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock900 - 4400 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache928 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1216 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C110 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA2049
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1235U
36 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
93 Points (65%)
min: 108     avg: 109     median: 109 (76%)     max: 110 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
406 Points (8%)
min: 828     avg: 948     median: 947.5 (18%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2485     avg: 6365     median: 6623 (6%)     max: 9208 Points
min: 12688     avg: 17445     median: 18177 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1444     avg: 1587     median: 1597 (68%)     max: 1698 Points
min: 1620     avg: 1803     median: 1810.5 (77%)     max: 1906 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 566     avg: 613     median: 617 (69%)     max: 651 Points
min: 622     avg: 694     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 735 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1783     avg: 2709     median: 2801 (7%)     max: 3537 Points
min: 4843     avg: 6712     median: 7138.5 (17%)     max: 7651 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 785     avg: 1125     median: 1093.5 (7%)     max: 1587 Points
min: 1581.9     avg: 2669     median: 2777.5 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 151.5     avg: 213.2     median: 217.5 (66%)     max: 242.3 Points
min: 238     avg: 262.8     median: 264.5 (80%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
34 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10300 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59935 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88902 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14374 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 292.1     avg: 366.7     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7940     avg: 12898     median: 12898 (20%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20166     avg: 30566     median: 30361.5 (17%)     max: 38643 MIPS
min: 52522     avg: 67897     median: 69924 (40%)     max: 76331 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4371     avg: 5000     median: 5137.5 (61%)     max: 5233 MIPS
min: 4502     avg: 5381     median: 5524.5 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.2 fps (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
335.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.99     avg: 7.8     median: 8.6 (15%)     max: 9.43 fps
min: 14.1     avg: 19.5     median: 20.8 (37%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (28%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (25%)     max: 11.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 707     avg: 955     median: 872 (11%)     max: 1374 Seconds
min: 285     avg: 357.4     median: 327.5 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 366     avg: 491     median: 470 (3%)     max: 662 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 201.3     median: 190 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4986     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.603 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 11420     median: 11420 (24%)     max: 12986 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.751 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
304.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80494 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7465     avg: 11105     median: 10290 (28%)     max: 15604 Points
min: 12693     avg: 20942     median: 21875 (59%)     max: 24629 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
67708 Points (55%)
min: 75240     avg: 75478     median: 75478 (61%)     max: 75716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75340     avg: 75417     median: 75417 (61%)     max: 75494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 84868     median: 84868 (71%)     max: 91059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6543     avg: 9959     median: 10446 (26%)     max: 12476 Points
min: 17876     avg: 18479     median: 18664 (47%)     max: 18896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9965     avg: 15291     median: 15301.5 (27%)     max: 19386 Points
min: 21106     avg: 27129     median: 27113 (48%)     max: 30623 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3133     avg: 5151     median: 5180.5 (22%)     max: 7083 Points
min: 6307     avg: 10831     median: 11696 (49%)     max: 12209 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1981     avg: 2095     median: 2094.5 (56%)     max: 2208 Points
min: 2199     avg: 2459     median: 2499 (67%)     max: 2570 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 6703     avg: 6875     median: 6874.5 (27%)     max: 7046 Points
min: 12825     avg: 13697     median: 13864 (55%)     max: 14160 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1426     avg: 1553     median: 1591.5 (67%)     max: 1643 Points
min: 1700     avg: 1825     median: 1847.5 (78%)     max: 1902 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5528     avg: 6774     median: 6084.5 (11%)     max: 8571 Points
min: 10441     avg: 13019     median: 13109 (23%)     max: 14230 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1402     avg: 1539     median: 1592 (7%)     max: 1602 Points
min: 1821     avg: 1826     median: 1825.5 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5450     avg: 7106     median: 7643 (24%)     max: 8558 Points
min: 13228     avg: 13600     median: 13600 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7602 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47960 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 485.6     avg: 571     median: 585 (1%)     max: 634 ms
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 517 (1%)     max: 594 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
99.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78578     avg: 80181     median: 79131 (69%)     max: 83104 Points
min: 90543     avg: 94193     median: 93980 (83%)     max: 98055 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 206     avg: 224     median: 226 (65%)     max: 236 Points
min: 237     avg: 260.6     median: 267.3 (77%)     max: 269 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 262.6     median: 251 (52%)     max: 305 Points
min: 237     avg: 281.5     median: 292 (61%)     max: 295 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 9253     avg: 10006     median: 10006 (16%)     max: 10759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11508     avg: 11533     median: 11533 (53%)     max: 11558 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 983     avg: 1383     median: 1430.5 (55%)     max: 1644 Points
min: 1589     avg: 1757     median: 1736.5 (67%)     max: 1971 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
min: 162     avg: 169.5     median: 169.5 (94%)     max: 177 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.8     avg: 43.5     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 63.2 Watt
min: 44.4     avg: 112.9     median: 125.7 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.9     avg: 46.9     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 69.5 Watt
min: 88     avg: 138.3     median: 154.9 (28%)     max: 171.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.22     avg: 7.9     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 16.6 Watt
min: 5.87     avg: 11.2     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 19.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.41     avg: 5.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 7.17 Watt
min: 11.7     avg: 15.4     median: 13.1 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 25.4 (19%)     max: 29 Points per Watt
min: 17.8     avg: 30.5     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1235U → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 160% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 18:22:59

#0 checking url part for id 14078 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719678178 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14078 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#7 got single benchmarks 14078 +0.03s ... 0.043s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.048s

#9 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.016s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.057s ... 0.121s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)