Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-11500B vs Intel Core i9-10885H

Intel Core i5-11500B

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i5-11500B ist ein Hexa-Core-Prozessor für Gaming-Notebooks, kleine Workstations oder auch Mini-PCs. Er basiert auf die Tiger-Lake-Architektur (H45) und wurde im 2. Quartal 2021 präsentiert. Der Chip bietet einen TDP von 65 Watt (konfigurierbar). Die sechs Prozessorkerne können von 3,3 bis 4,6 GHz (Einzelkern-Turbo) takten. Der Prozessor bietet 12 MB Level 3 Cache und unterstützt DDR4-RAM mit bis zu 3.200 MT/s. Die integrierte Grafik basiert auf der Xe-Architektur und ist UHD Graphics benannt (32 EUs). Im 11500B taktet sie von 350 bis 1.450 MHz. Der Chip wird im 10 nm SuperFin Prozess gefertigt.

Performance

Die Leistung des Intel Core i5-11500B hängt primär von der Leistungsfähigkeit der verbauten Kühleinheit ab. Zudem lässt sich die TDP des SoC auch absenken. Grundsätzlich sollte der Intel Core i5-11500B aber etwas mehr Leistung als ein Intel Core i5-11400H bieten.

Features

Wie bei den kleineren Tiger-Lake-Chips wird auch hier WLAN (Wi-Fi 6E) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4  im Chip (teil-)integriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. Des Weiteren bietet der i5-11500B 20 PCIe 4.0 Lanes.

Intel Core i9-10885H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10885H

The Intel Core i9-10885H is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i9-10855H supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP. 

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10885H should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10885H is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i5-11500BIntel Core i9-10885H
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-11900KB compare3.3 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11900H compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11955M compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11850H compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11500B « 3.3 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400H compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4600 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache480 KB512 KB
L2 Cache7.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1787FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$556 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11500B
36.7 pt (51%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10885H
36.2 pt (50%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
88 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
451 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8318 Points (8%)
min: 8802     avg: 9438     median: 9438 (9%)     max: 10074 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1484 Points (63%)
min: 1284     avg: 1290     median: 1289.5 (55%)     max: 1295 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
566 Points (63%)
min: 460     avg: 487.3     median: 489 (54%)     max: 513 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3236 Points (8%)
min: 2798     avg: 3400     median: 3639 (9%)     max: 3762 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1322 Points (8%)
min: 1264     avg: 1502     median: 1517 (10%)     max: 1726 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
223 Points (67%)
min: 197     avg: 206.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9000 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41001 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
54928 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11802 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
152 s (2%)
131.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.6 s (1%)
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6789 Points (11%)
6420 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
36194 MIPS (21%)
min: 36740     avg: 40519     median: 41823 (24%)     max: 42993 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5498 MIPS (66%)
min: 5397     avg: 5551     median: 5589 (67%)     max: 5668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
68.7 fps (24%)
80.5 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
234.5 fps (54%)
217.8 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
10.3 fps (18%)
min: 10.6     avg: 11.5     median: 11.3 (20%)     max: 12.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.3 GB/s (22%)
9.9 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
673 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
379 Seconds (3%)
min: 283     avg: 311     median: 302 (2%)     max: 348 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (12%)
min: 0.564     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.572 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12580 Points (27%)
12101 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
16.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
373 s (2%)
433.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
47824 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13784 Points (37%)
min: 12279     avg: 14604     median: 14291 (39%)     max: 17242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70795 Points (58%)
31296 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
70878 Points (58%)
30997 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74085 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
12557 Points (32%)
min: 11176     avg: 12814     median: 12814 (32%)     max: 14452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
19930 Points (36%)
min: 17249     avg: 19483     median: 20594 (37%)     max: 20606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7021 Points (30%)
min: 6510     avg: 7798     median: 8203 (35%)     max: 8682 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2173 Points (58%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
8148 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1566 Points (66%)
min: 1216     avg: 1303     median: 1317 (56%)     max: 1376 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7132 Points (13%)
min: 6529     avg: 7045     median: 6914 (12%)     max: 7693 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1535 Points (7%)
min: 1234     avg: 1281     median: 1280.5 (6%)     max: 1327 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7012 Points (22%)
min: 6598     avg: 7172     median: 7172 (23%)     max: 7746 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6663 Points (67%)
min: 5672     avg: 5676     median: 5675.5 (57%)     max: 5679 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28454 Points (31%)
min: 26114     avg: 29009     median: 29009 (32%)     max: 31904 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
649 ms (1%)
min: 730     avg: 738     median: 734 (1%)     max: 749 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
58398 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
271 Points (56%)
min: 233     avg: 234.3     median: 234 (49%)     max: 236 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1416 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
75.7 Watt (13%)
min: 78.1     avg: 103.7     median: 116.4 (20%)     max: 116.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95 Watt (17%)
min: 125.2     avg: 131.2     median: 126 (23%)     max: 142.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13.9 Points per Watt (10%)
min: 10.1     avg: 11.5     median: 10.7 (8%)     max: 13.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11500B → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10885H → 99% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 23:00:12

#0 checking url part for id 17400 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11962 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719867612 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17400 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 17400 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11962 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 11962 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.073s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)