Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Intel Core i7-8809G

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core i7-8809G

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8809G

The Intel Core i7-8809G is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2018. similar to the Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 it integrates four processor cores clocked at 3.1 - 4.2 GHz. As a speciality the package also contains a Vega based graphics card from AMD (with 24 CUs = 1536 shaders at 1190 MHz) and 4 GB HBM2 graphics memory. The CPU is still produced in 14nm as the i7-7920HQ.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Compared to the i7-7920HQ, the i7-8809G should be slightly faster due to the HBM2 memory, 100 MHz higher Boost clock and the 100 Watt TDP. The performance is therefore sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

In addition to the Intel HD Graphics 630 in the CPU die, the Core i7-8809G also offers an AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH graphics card with 24 Cus and therefore more than double the amount of the current Ryzen APUs (e.g. Ryzen 7 2700 with 10 CUs).

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The 8809G should also support HDCP 2.2, but for HDMI 2.0, it most likely needs a converter from DisplayPort.

Power Consumption

The CPU chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors. It is rated at a TDP of around 100 Watt and therefore is only suited for laptops with good cooling solutions. Compared to laptops with Core i7-H quad cores and dedicated graphics cards, the i7-8809G based models can be built with smaller chassis.

ModelIntel Core i5-1145G7Intel Core i7-8809G
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Core i7
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Kaby Lake-G
Series: Core i7 Kaby Lake-G
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8809G « 3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8709G compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8706G compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8705G compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4400 MHz3100 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB256 KB
L2 Cache5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt100 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (1063 - 1190 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
32.8 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8809G
29.5 pt (41%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
531 Points (59%)
404 Points (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
2005 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
min: 864     avg: 865     median: 865 (5%)     max: 866 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (61%)     max: 203 Points
min: 178     avg: 179     median: 179 (54%)     max: 180 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
9.4 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.36 Points
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
6668 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
25809 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (24%)     max: 35372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
min: 186.7     avg: 190.9     median: 190.9 (2%)     max: 195 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
min: 6.532     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (1%)     max: 6.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
5984 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
19347 MIPS (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
4101 MIPS (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.3 fps (16%)
53.4 fps (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
192 fps (44%)
200.3 fps (46%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
7.1 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
4.8 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1116 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
537 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
8837 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
9.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
19.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
484.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30874 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (30%)     max: 11536 Points
11010 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63423 Points (52%)
56119 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63591 Points (52%)
57490 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
65828 Points (55%)
58074 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
8497 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
12168 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
4895 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1430 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5351 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6226 Points (62%)
5268 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20787 Points (23%)
17183 Points (19%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
1054 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
78.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
34543 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
177.4 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (50%)     max: 243 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (49%)     max: 1290 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8809G → 98% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 04:55:46

#0 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9618 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720061746 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#7 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.007s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9618 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#9 got single benchmarks 9618 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.076s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.079s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)