Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6000

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Pentium Silver N6000

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6000

The Intel Pentium Silver N6000 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6000 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process, the same process as Ice Lake.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the four CPU cores, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 850 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4x memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6000 in our database proves to be an OK entry-level processor, as of late 2022, its multi-thread benchmark scores nearly matching those of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. Yes, the chip is a whole lot slower than the latest Ryzen 3 and Core i3 processors, but it will at least let you run your day-to-day apps without annoying slowdowns.

The Asus Vivobook 13 Slate is among the fastest systems built around the N6000 that we know of, thanks to the long-term CPU power limit of 10 W. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

Like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N6000 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The SoC is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1145G7Intel Pentium Silver N6000
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 « 1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4400 MHz1100 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP28 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3 x 8, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (350 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
32.8 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6000
21.9 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
min: 1610     avg: 1730     median: 1699 (2%)     max: 1911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
min: 653     avg: 669     median: 672.5 (29%)     max: 679 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
531 Points (59%)
min: 237     avg: 253.8     median: 255 (28%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
min: 595     avg: 657     median: 650.5 (2%)     max: 730 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
min: 266     avg: 292.5     median: 291 (2%)     max: 322 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (61%)     max: 203 Points
min: 109     avg: 114.3     median: 113.7 (34%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
min: 3.47     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (5%)     max: 3.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.36 Points
min: 1.36     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (35%)     max: 1.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
min: 4057     avg: 4132     median: 4131.5 (25%)     max: 4206 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
min: 9343     avg: 9643     median: 9642.5 (7%)     max: 9942 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (24%)     max: 35372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
727 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
16.9 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
1330 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
min: 8096     avg: 8953     median: 9212 (5%)     max: 9668 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
min: 2320     avg: 2934     median: 3305 (40%)     max: 3387 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.3 fps (16%)
18.4 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
192 fps (44%)
93.4 fps (22%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
min: 1.55     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.76 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
2.8 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1116 Seconds (14%)
3786 Seconds (48%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
min: 1738     avg: 2163     median: 1935 (14%)     max: 3157 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
min: 1.084     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.278 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
3985 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
895 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30874 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (30%)     max: 11536 Points
min: 3134     avg: 3617     median: 3563 (10%)     max: 4155 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63423 Points (52%)
min: 30345     avg: 32921     median: 32921 (27%)     max: 35497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63591 Points (52%)
min: 30120     avg: 32790     median: 32790 (27%)     max: 35460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
65828 Points (55%)
min: 38897     avg: 43994     median: 43993.5 (37%)     max: 49090 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
min: 2524     avg: 2897     median: 2947 (7%)     max: 3220 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
min: 3838     avg: 4315     median: 4063 (7%)     max: 5296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
min: 1161     avg: 1301     median: 1259.5 (5%)     max: 1523 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 720     avg: 728     median: 727 (31%)     max: 736 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
min: 1784     avg: 1912     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 2004 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (6%)
min: 723     avg: 725     median: 724.5 (3%)     max: 726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5351 Points (17%)
min: 1881     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (6%)     max: 1942 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6226 Points (62%)
3188 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20787 Points (23%)
8341 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
min: 1388     avg: 1412     median: 1405 (2%)     max: 1451 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
293.2 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25840     avg: 32251     median: 34145.5 (30%)     max: 34874 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
177.4 Points (51%)
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (50%)     max: 243 Points
min: 138.4     avg: 143.8     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (49%)     max: 1290 Points
min: 440     avg: 469     median: 469 (18%)     max: 498 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
min: 11.3     avg: 12     median: 12 (2%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
min: 10.5     avg: 13.3     median: 12.9 (2%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.9 Watt (7%)
3.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
min: 3.37     avg: 5.4     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 8.08 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 19.6     avg: 22.3     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 26.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6000 → 53% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 27. 17:41:49

#0 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13075 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719502909 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.008s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13075 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 13075 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.061s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)