Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Intel Celeron N5100

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the N5100 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 20% slower than the N6000, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. In other words, this is a fairly slow processor that is unlikely to make anybody happy.

Power Consumption

Like most other N-class Intel processors, this Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation or second-generation [no exact data available] 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1145G7Intel Celeron N5100
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4400 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP28 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
32.8 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
531 Points (59%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (61%)     max: 203 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (24%)     max: 35372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.3 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
192 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1116 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30874 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (30%)     max: 11536 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63423 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63591 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
65828 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1430 Points
631 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
1788 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5351 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6226 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20787 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
177.4 Points (51%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (50%)     max: 243 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (49%)     max: 1290 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.9 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 39% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 06:05:28

#0 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719893128 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.024s ... 0.045s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)