Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1145G7 vs Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i5-1155G7

Intel Core i5-1145G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1145G7

The Intel Core i5-1145G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1.1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.6 GHz (28 Watt). The Boost is always specified at 4.4 GHz (one or two cores).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip. In addition to this, the i5 supports vPro for easy remote management.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. The Celeron was announced in early 2021. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz (base clock speed) Boosting up to 2.9 GHz (single-core Boost) with 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache but no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology. This processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen 10 nm process to be not unlike the Ice Lake-U Core-series processors. The faster Celeron N5105 is notable for being more energy efficient (10 W TDP vs N5095's 15 W) yet featuring a faster iGPU model (24 EU UHD Graphics versus 16 EU UHD Graphics, with a higher clock rate to boot).

Architecture

Tremont architecture brings many improvements over the outgoing Goldmont architecture we know from Pentium N5030 and so many other N-class CPUs. According to Intel, the new architecture brings a 30% boost in single thread performance (+10% to +80% in SPECint and SPECfp depending on the test).

While the older N-class Celerons and Pentiums had to be content with up to 8 GB of DDR4-2400 RAM, Celeron N5095 is officially compatible with up to 16 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-2933 memory. Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) support is partially baked into the chip. The Celeron supports up to 8 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes, up to 14 USB 3.2 ports and up to two SATA III ports. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Jasper Lake processor package is larger compared to what Gemini Lake models had (35 x 24 mm vs. 25 x 24 mm). Please note that the Celeron gets soldered on to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database matches the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Even if the cooling system is great and the Power Limits are high as the sky, some slight architectural improvements together with the updated manufacturing node and higher-than-usual wattage of the Celeron are not nearly enough to let it compete with modern Core and Ryzen-series processors. It's a good option for basic day-to-day tasks, but anything beyond that will be a struggle.

Graphics

The CPU features the DirectX 12-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics iGPU running at 450 MHz to 750 MHz. The graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 displays with resolutions up to 4096x2160@60; it will happily decode HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. (You can still play such a video but it will be software-decoded rather than hardware-decoded which puts a hard limit on the watchable resolution as the CPU cores are not very fast here.)

This is not a gaming GPU by any stretch of imagination. It is just as fast as an HD Graphics 515; it will let you play the least demanding titles (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided you are OK with 720p resolution and lowest quality preset possible.

Power consumption

Most N-class Celerons and Pentiums have a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit). The Celeron N5095 on the other hand has a 15 Watt TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core i3/i5/i7 processors. This basically means that passively cooled designs are out of the question with this chip.

This Intel processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen or second-gen 10 nm process [no precise data available] for OK, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

The Intel Core i5-1155G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in mid 2021 as part of the refresh. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.5 GHz (28 Watt). Boost clock speed is 4.5 GHz.

Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics adapter with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Performance

The average 1155G7 in our database proves to be a very decent mid-range processor, as of mid 2022, trading blows with the Core i7-10810U and the Ryzen 5 4500U as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While perhaps not the best option for power users, this Core i5 will make most consumers happy, providing for short load times and generally pain-free experience.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, this is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i5-1155G7 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1145G7Intel Celeron N5095Intel Core i5-1155G7
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Jasper LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Jasper LakeTiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i7-1195G72.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G73 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G72.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G72.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 « 2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G72.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G42 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G43 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G72.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G73 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G72.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G72.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G72.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G42 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G43 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4400 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB1.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 44 / 8
TDP28 Watt15 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA1338BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1145G7
32.8 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
21.6 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
33.9 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 4769     avg: 4880     median: 4880 (5%)     max: 4991 Points
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1361     avg: 1375     median: 1374.5 (58%)     max: 1388 Points
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (60%)     max: 1446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
531 Points (59%)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (26%)     max: 239 Points
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (61%)     max: 551 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1693     avg: 1842     median: 1841.5 (4%)     max: 1990 Points
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 791     avg: 792     median: 791.5 (5%)     max: 792 Points
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 202     avg: 202.5     median: 202.5 (61%)     max: 203 Points
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (32%)     max: 109 Points
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (64%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.12     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.41 Points
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.26     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.36 Points
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8225     avg: 8275     median: 8274.5 (50%)     max: 8324 Points
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 25475     avg: 25545     median: 25545 (19%)     max: 25615 Points
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33427     avg: 34400     median: 34399.5 (24%)     max: 35372 Points
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (12%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10472     avg: 10648     median: 10648 (13%)     max: 10824 Points
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 227.285     avg: 281.1     median: 281.1 (3%)     max: 335 s
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.499     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 10.2 s
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4190     avg: 4707     median: 4706.5 (7%)     max: 5223 Points
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 20565     avg: 21844     median: 21844 (13%)     max: 23123 MIPS
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4751     avg: 4802     median: 4802 (57%)     max: 4853 MIPS
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (59%)     max: 4949 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.3 fps (16%)
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (9%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
192 fps (44%)
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 5.46     avg: 6     median: 6 (11%)     max: 6.6 fps
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.437     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.469 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.713     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.802 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.6 GB/s (15%)
2.5 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1116 Seconds (14%)
2936 Seconds (37%)
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 601     avg: 641     median: 641 (5%)     max: 681 Seconds
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.627     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.63 sec
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 8786     avg: 8923     median: 8922.5 (19%)     max: 9059 Points
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.2     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.825 s
20.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.7     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (1%)     max: 17.298 s
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 366     avg: 389.8     median: 389.8 (2%)     max: 413.691 s
1039 s (5%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30874 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10880     avg: 11208     median: 11208 (30%)     max: 11536 Points
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (12%)     max: 4439 Points
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (32%)     max: 11925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63423 Points (52%)
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63591 Points (52%)
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
65828 Points (55%)
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (40%)     max: 48186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8524     avg: 8726     median: 8725.5 (22%)     max: 8927 Points
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13209     avg: 13311     median: 13311 (24%)     max: 13413 Points
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4092     avg: 4290     median: 4289.5 (18%)     max: 4487 Points
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1427     avg: 1429     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (27%)     max: 659 Points
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (62%)     max: 1480 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5055     avg: 5261     median: 5261 (9%)     max: 5467 Points
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1423 Points (6%)
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5351 Points (17%)
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6226 Points (62%)
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
20787 Points (23%)
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (9%)     max: 7968 Points
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (24%)     max: 22395 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 702     avg: 712     median: 712 (1%)     max: 722 ms
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
177.4 Points (51%)
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (27%)     max: 96.2 Points
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (55%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 234     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (50%)     max: 243 Points
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (26%)     max: 127.2 Points
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (51%)     max: 245 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1279     avg: 1285     median: 1284.5 (49%)     max: 1290 Points
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (19%)     max: 495 Points
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (53%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38     avg: 42.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 47.5 Watt
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.2     avg: 50.4     median: 50.4 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.9 Watt (7%)
4.9 Watt (3%)
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.5 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1145G7 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 52% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 108% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 07:20:36

#0 checking url part for id 12236 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720070436 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12236 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#8 got single benchmarks 12236 +0.007s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.007s ... 0.032s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.003s ... 0.035s

#12 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.009s ... 0.044s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.103s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)