Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10600K vs Intel Core i5-1155G7

Intel Core i5-10600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10600K

The Intel Core i5-10600K is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 4.1 and 4.8 GHz and can execute up to twelfe threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high clock speeds (and possible TDP settings with most mainboards), the Core i5-10600K offers a similar speed than the old Core i7-9700K quad core. Compared to current AMD offerings, the multi-core performance is on par with a Ryzen 5 3600, single core and gaming performance with a faster Ryzen 9 3900.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

The Intel Core i5-1155G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in mid 2021 as part of the refresh. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.5 GHz (28 Watt). Boost clock speed is 4.5 GHz.

Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics adapter with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Performance

The average 1155G7 in our database proves to be a very decent mid-range processor, as of mid 2022, trading blows with the Core i7-10810U and the Ryzen 5 4500U as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While perhaps not the best option for power users, this Core i5 will make most consumers happy, providing for short load times and generally pain-free experience.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, this is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i5-1155G7 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-10600KIntel Core i5-1155G7
CodenameComet LakeTiger Lake-UP3
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K « 4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock4100 - 4800 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB320 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP125 Watt28 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$262 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10600K
31.9 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
31.7 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10475 Points (10%)
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1385 Points (56%)
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (58%)     max: 1446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
464 Points (51%)
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (60%)     max: 551 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3443 Points (8%)
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1452 Points (9%)
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
205 Points (57%)
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (58%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
15.8 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7343 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40074 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
51816 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9594 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
113.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6536 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
40379 MIPS (23%)
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5289 MIPS (62%)
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (58%)     max: 4949 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
251.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.2 fps (21%)
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
302.4 Seconds (2%)
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
438.7 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15961 Points (39%)
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (29%)     max: 11925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68275 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68908 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
70668 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13014 Points (33%)
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20040 Points (36%)
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8290 Points (35%)
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1830 Points (42%)
1984 Points (46%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
10290 Points (40%)
6103 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1878 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
6243 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1286 Points (43%)
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (50%)     max: 1480 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7248 Points (13%)
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1281 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7237 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5821 Points (58%)
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28391 Points (28%)
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (22%)     max: 22395 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
760 ms (1%)
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (49%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
239 Points (43%)
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (44%)     max: 245 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (52%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
204.4 Watt (35%)
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
172.5 Watt (31%)
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10600K → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 84% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 12. 21:07:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12212 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765570026s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Dec 2025 05:18:44 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12212 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 12212 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.01s ... 0.029s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.064s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)