Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 5600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X is a desktop processor with 6 SMT-enabled (12 threads) and based on the Zen 3 architecture. Launched in November 2020, it is the fastest 6-core Ryzen desktop processor. With a TDP of 65 watts, the Ryzen 5 5600X is the least energy-hungry model in the Zen 3 family to date.

The Ryzen 5 5600X is clocked at 3.7 GHz base clock and can be clocked up to 4.6 GHz with Precision Boost 2.

Performance

The average 5600X in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 9 4900H and the Ryzen 7 6800HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While this isn't the fastest CPU money can buy, it still rips through most workloads with ease, as of mid 2022. Find out more in our full review.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W to be in line with most desktop processors.

The R5 5600X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-10400FAMD Ryzen 5 5600X
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
CodenameComet LakeVermeer (Zen 3)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen 3)
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compare3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X compare3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X « 3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock2900 - 4300 MHz3700 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB3 MB
L3 Cache12 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C
SocketLGA1200AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$155 U.S.$299 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 5600X
41.9 pt (58%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11838 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1541 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (49%)
601 Points (67%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
4567 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
1968 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (54%)
254 Points (77%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.4 Points (19%)
21.8 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
3 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6719 Points (41%)
6462 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
39331 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (33%)
69545 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
12563 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
113.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
3.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13282 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
56607 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (61%)
6594 MIPS (79%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (28%)
117 fps (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (53%)
320 fps (74%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
15.7 fps (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.7 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
260.2 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14576 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.7 s (2%)
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
400.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
66603 Points (58%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14539 Points (39%)
19649 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
88825 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
88777 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
91500 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
16447 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25990 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
8911 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
1657 Points (70%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
8980 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
1587 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
8926 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
6953 Points (69%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
35617 Points (39%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
578 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (45%)
286 Points (60%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1489 Points (57%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
175.8 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
170.1 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
11.6 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 5600X → 129% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 22:43:35

#0 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12785 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720039415 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12785 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 12785 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.06s

#12 return log +0.039s ... 0.099s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)