Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10310U vs Intel Processor N50 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Core i5-10310U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10310U

The Intel Core i5-10310U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i5). The processor cores are clocked between 1.7 and 4.4 GHz (unverified). Thanks to HyperThreading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i5-10510U, the level 3 cache was reduced from 8 to 6 MB. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here. The CPU supports the professional management features under the vPro umbrella.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1100 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10310U in our database is not really any different than other quad-core laptop CPUs running at similar clock speeds, such as the Ryzen 5 3450U or the Core i5-1035G4.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Perhaps more importantly, short-term power consumption can be as high as 80 W or even 90 W as far as 10th gen Comet Lake U chips are concerned, making passively cooled designs unlikely.

This Intel processor is manufactured on a fairly old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N50

► remove from comparison Intel N50

The Intel Processor N50 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 2 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Processor N100 (4 cores, 3.4 GHz) due to the reduced core count. The single thread performance however, should be similar. Compared to older processors, the N50 should be comparable to dual core Skylake based CPUs like the Intel Core m3-8100Y (2x 3.4 GHz, 5W).Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 16 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only up to 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N50 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i5-10310UIntel Processor N50Intel Processor N200
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameComet Lake-UAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U « 1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 « 1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1700 - 4400 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 2
2 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1528
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10310U
29 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3094 Points (3%)
45%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1051 Points (45%)
66%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 411     avg: 428.2     median: 438 (49%)     max: 438 Points
61%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1192     avg: 1365     median: 1327 (3%)     max: 1588 Points
41%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 499     avg: 601     median: 546 (3%)     max: 767 Points
40%
1 N200 +
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 164     avg: 169.4     median: 170 (51%)     max: 173.8 Points
66%
1 N200 +
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 15976     avg: 17406     median: 16475 (9%)     max: 19935 MIPS
43%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3615     avg: 4121     median: 4274 (51%)     max: 4398 MIPS
76%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.88     avg: 4.3     median: 4.1 (7%)     max: 5.35 fps
37%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 683     avg: 838     median: 864 (6%)     max: 896 Seconds
90%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.703     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.806 sec
89%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6293     avg: 6750     median: 6819.5 (18%)     max: 7069 Points
41%
1 N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
49816 Points (40%)
56%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
47614 Points (39%)
60%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
60106 Points (51%)
58%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5616     avg: 7066     median: 7280.5 (18%)     max: 8087 Points
39%
1 N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 7932     avg: 9613     median: 10142 (18%)     max: 11216 Points
41%
1 N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2718     avg: 2858     median: 2867 (12%)     max: 2989 Points
44%
1 N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N50 +
1185 Points (32%)
81%
1 N200 +
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N50 +
2024 Points (8%)
82%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1040     avg: 1100     median: 1122 (47%)     max: 1128 Points
79%
N50 +
891 Points (38%)
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2821     avg: 3469     median: 3717.5 (7%)     max: 3854 Points
36%
N50 +
1339 Points (2%)
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1040 Points (5%)
86%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2931 Points (9%)
52%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4691     avg: 4815     median: 4814.5 (48%)     max: 4938 Points
95%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12023     avg: 12621     median: 12621 (14%)     max: 13219 Points
79%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4938 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12023 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 929     avg: 1017     median: 938 (1%)     max: 1156 ms
99%
1 N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
202.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 44332     avg: 45975     median: 46029 (40%)     max: 47563 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 168     avg: 191.3     median: 195 (41%)     max: 201 Points
88%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.5     avg: 30.7     median: 31.2 (5%)     max: 33 Watt
103%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 41.3     median: 40.7 (7%)     max: 46 Watt
105%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.2     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 18.2 Points per Watt
106%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10310U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N50 → 58% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 62% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 19:03:05

#0 checking url part for id 12202 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14971 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719939785 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12202 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 12202 +0.009s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14971 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 14971 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#12 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.034s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.043s ... 0.077s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)