Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-10200H vs Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and Mac Mini entry level models. It offers 10 of the 12 cores available in the chip divided in six performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 Bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The performance of the M2 Pro 10-Core should be similar to the old M1 Pro with all 10 cores. The multi-threaded performance should be slower, as the M2 10-core has two p-cores less (and 2 e-cores more) but the single-threaded performance should be better due to the faster clock speed and architectural improvements. The old M1 Pro 8-core should be noticeably slower.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro 10-core offers all 16 of the 19 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Pro), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. 

ModelIntel Core i5-10200HApple M2 Pro 10-Core
SeriesIntel Comet LakeApple Apple M2
CodenameComet Lake-H
Series: Apple M2
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Apple M2 Max compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 compare2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2424 - 3696 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB7.3 MB
L2 Cache1 MB36 MB
L3 Cache8 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 10
TDP45 Watt
Technology14 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SSTARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
Transistors40000 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5372 Points (5%)
11811 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1089 Points (46%)
1643 Points (70%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
419 Points (47%)
449 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2082 Points (5%)
3235 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
842 Points (5%)
1664 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171.6 Points (52%)
231 Points (70%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4497 MIPS (54%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
435 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
515 Seconds (4%)
415 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
6233 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (46%)     max: 1095 Points
min: 1926     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (82%)     max: 1947 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
min: 12074     avg: 12132     median: 12131.5 (22%)     max: 12189 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
882 ms (1%)
447.4 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
75471 Points (66%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
250 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
187.3 Points (39%)
391 Points (81%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1772 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
2.2 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (5%)
5.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 10-Core → 170% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 10:16:07

#0 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14977 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720080967 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14977 +0s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14977 +0s ... 0.013s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.027s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)