Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-N300 vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3800XT

The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 2 architecture. At launch it is the fastest 8-core-CPU of the Matisse series. The 3800XT clocks from 3.9 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (Turbo). All eight cores can reach up to 4.2 GHz.

Performance

The average 3800XT in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-12500H, Core i5-13500H, Core i9-10910, Ryzen 7 5700G, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series processor has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 105 W. Needless to say, if one was to overclock it, the chip's power consumption would go up by a huge margin.

The R7 3800XT is built with TSMC's 7 nm process making for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

► remove from comparison AMD R9 3900X

Der AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ist ein Desktop-Prozessor der Matisse Serie mit 12-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT), weshalb dieser 24 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Mit dem Launch am 07.07.2019 ist der Ryzen 9 3900X der schnellste Ryzen 9 Prozessor und mit 105 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Bis zur endgültigen Verfügbarkeit des Ryzen 9 3950X bleibt der Ryzen 9 3900X allerdings das Topmodell, denn der Ryzen 9 3950X soll erst im September 2019 folgen und insgesamt 16 Kerne bieten. 

Der Ryzen 9 3900X taktet mit 3,8 GHz Basistakt und kann per Turbo auf bis zu 4,6 GHz takten. Bei Last aller 12 Kerne erreicht der Ryzen 9 3900X maximal 4,3 GHz. Dank des Precision Boost 2 kann der Takt auf einem höheren Level gehalten werden, wie wir es schon von Zen+ her kennen.

Die Leistung des AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ist durchweg bei allen Anwendungen hervorragend. Vor allem bei Multi-Thread-Anwendungen kann hier der native 12-Kerner seine Stärken ausspielen und kann es sogar mit einem AMD Threadripper 1950X aufnehmen.

Die vier CCX-Cluster bestehend aus jeweils 4 CPU-Kernen, von denen jeweils drei aktiv sind befinden sich in zwei CCD-Packages (je 3 Kerne mit eigenem 16 MByte L3 Cache). Ein CCD-Package ist genau 74 mm² groß und wird im neuen 7 nm Verfahren bei TSMC gefertigt. Bei den beiden Ryzen-9-Prozessoren befinden sich zwei dieser CCD-Einheiten unter dem Heatspreader. Der I/O-Die ist separiert und kommt im mit der älteren 12 nm Strukturbreite daher, welcher weiterhin von Gobalfoundries gefertigt. 

Bei Spielen kann der AMD Ryzen 9 3900X dank der verbesserten IPC überzeugen. Schlussendlich kommt es jedoch immer auf die Unterstützung der Spiele an. Wer nur Spielen möchte, ist gut beraten sich den AMD Ryzen 7 3700X genauer anzuschauen. Wer jedoch gleichzeitig Streamen oder Videos bearbeiten möchte, für diejenigen ist der Ryzen 9 3900X die bessere Wahl. 

ModelIntel Core i3-N300AMD Ryzen 7 3800XTAMD Ryzen 9 3900X
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)
CodenameAlder Lake-NMatisse (Zen 2)Matisse (Zen 2)
Series: Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop) Matisse (Zen 2)
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT « 3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Clock <=3800 MHz3900 - 4700 MHz3800 - 4600 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB32 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 1612 / 24
TDP7 Watt105 Watt105 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C95 °C95 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB6 MB
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)AM4 (LGA1331)
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
$399 U.S.$499 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
20 pt (28%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3800XT
39.1 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 3900X
40.5 pt (56%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
34 Points (24%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2546 Points (2%)
19000 Points (18%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
513 Points (22%)
1370 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
195 Points (22%)
544 Points (60%)
min: 504     avg: 512     median: 514 (57%)     max: 519 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
968 Points (2%)
5120 Points (12%)
min: 6882     avg: 6952     median: 6910 (17%)     max: 7065 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
416 Points (3%)
2230 Points (14%)
min: 3018     avg: 3057     median: 3049 (19%)     max: 3104 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
85 Points (26%)
219 Points (66%)
min: 202.9     avg: 206.3     median: 207 (62%)     max: 209 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.3 Points (7%)
24.2 Points (31%)
min: 33.44     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (44%)     max: 34.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (25%)
2.4 Points (59%)
min: 2.35     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (59%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2884 Points (17%)
6035 Points (36%)
min: 5992     avg: 6019     median: 6018.5 (36%)     max: 6045 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
12014 Points (9%)
40528 Points (29%)
min: 45047     avg: 45539     median: 45539 (33%)     max: 46031 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
18450 Points (13%)
68388 Points (47%)
min: 76051     avg: 76666     median: 76666 (53%)     max: 77281 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
4497 Points (5%)
10497 Points (13%)
min: 10352     avg: 10418     median: 10417.5 (13%)     max: 10483 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
531 s (6%)
81.4 s (1%)
min: 57.5     avg: 64.9     median: 64.9 (1%)     max: 72.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
17.5 s (4%)
3.7 s (1%)
min: 2.564     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.811 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1915 Points (3%)
7467 Points (12%)
min: 7529     avg: 7534     median: 7534 (12%)     max: 7539 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
11976 MIPS (7%)
59247 MIPS (34%)
min: 76732     avg: 79929     median: 80935 (46%)     max: 82119 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2403 MIPS (29%)
5516 MIPS (66%)
min: 5185     avg: 5345     median: 5316 (64%)     max: 5533 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
28.9 fps (10%)
119 fps (42%)
147 fps (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
106.6 fps (25%)
271 fps (63%)
267.5 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3.2 fps (6%)
16.1 fps (28%)
min: 20.6     avg: 20.8     median: 20.8 (36%)     max: 20.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
1.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
2 GB/s (34%)
2.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.6 GB/s (7%)
11.4 GB/s (30%)
min: 10.6     avg: 10.8     median: 10.8 (28%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1095 Seconds (8%)
222.7 Seconds (2%)
min: 161.7     avg: 163.6     median: 162.3 (1%)     max: 166.8 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.3 sec (29%)
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.534     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.542 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 i3-N300 +
4261 Points (9%)
min: 14310     avg: 14803     median: 14889 (32%)     max: 14948 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
33.2 s (7%)
9.1 s (2%)
9.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
69.1 s (3%)
19.6 s (1%)
19.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1381 s (6%)
508 s (2%)
511 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 i3-N300 +
15263 Points (13%)
min: 67309     avg: 68033     median: 68132 (60%)     max: 68694 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4983 Points (13%)
18905 Points (51%)
min: 18030     avg: 18763     median: 18932 (51%)     max: 19423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
28114 Points (23%)
82027 Points (67%)
min: 73712     avg: 75420     median: 75582 (61%)     max: 76230 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
28073 Points (23%)
82302 Points (67%)
min: 74027     avg: 75640     median: 75774.5 (61%)     max: 76405 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
28903 Points (24%)
84207 Points (71%)
min: 75265     avg: 76737     median: 76898 (65%)     max: 78314 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4049 Points (10%)
14253 Points (36%)
min: 16219     avg: 17989     median: 18192.5 (46%)     max: 18441 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5528 Points (10%)
25132 Points (45%)
min: 27809     avg: 28863     median: 28975 (52%)     max: 29484 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10302 Points (43%)
min: 0     avg: 11332     median: 11923 (50%)     max: 12484 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
762 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 i3-N300 +
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
626 Points (26%)
1353 Points (57%)
min: 1223     avg: 1250     median: 1250 (53%)     max: 1275 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2674 Points (5%)
8948 Points (16%)
min: 6372     avg: 9556     median: 10498 (19%)     max: 10854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
616 Points (3%)
1360 Points (6%)
min: 1247     avg: 1262     median: 1247 (5%)     max: 1293 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2642 Points (8%)
9163 Points (29%)
min: 11135     avg: 11252     median: 11135 (35%)     max: 11485 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2913 Points (29%)
5830 Points (58%)
min: 5575     avg: 5712     median: 5680 (57%)     max: 5880 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9894 Points (11%)
35526 Points (39%)
min: 42241     avg: 43190     median: 43350 (48%)     max: 43978 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1638 ms (2%)
683 ms (1%)
727 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
104.3 Points (22%)
249 Points (52%)
225 Points (47%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 i3-N300 +
529 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
24.4 Watt (4%)
191.8 Watt (33%)
min: 193.6     avg: 202.1     median: 202.1 (35%)     max: 210.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
193.7 Watt (35%)
min: 214.6     avg: 221.9     median: 221.9 (40%)     max: 229.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 i3-N300 +
14.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
min: 13.3     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 14.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT → 298% n=40

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 3900X → 339% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 30. 02:23:55

#0 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12265 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11456 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719707035 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12265 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 12265 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11456 +0.005s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 11456 +0.024s ... 0.054s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.076s ... 0.13s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.13s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)