Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i7-13700 vs Intel Core i9-9900T

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

The Intel Core i3-9100F is an entry level Quad-Core processor for desktop PCs based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.2 GHz without HyperThreading / SMT support (4 threads only). The CPU is still manufactured in 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. 

Compared to the older Core i3-8100, the i3-9100F offers around 10 to 15 percent higher performance. Therefore, the CPU is well suited for simple office tasks but less for high end gaming or demanding applications.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor wont need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i7-13700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a fast and relatively economical desktop processor from the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced in early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.1 GHz. It reaches up to 5.2 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the number of E-cores has been doubled to 8, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700 offers up to 24 threads together with its 8 P-cores. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process called "Intel 7". There is no freely selectable multiplier for the Intel Core i7-13700 (compared to the faster i7-13700K) and the LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series continues to serve as the basis.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700, the IPC of the new Core i7-13700 has been increased slightly. At the same time, the 4 additional E-cores now provide slightly more performance for multi-threaded tasks. This puts the Intel Core i7-13700 at the level of an Intel Core i9-12900K, which also offers a total of 24 threads.

iGPU

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 however is only suitable for office use and very old or low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 219 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently and even exceeded with good cooling. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

Intel Core i9-9900T

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9900T

The Intel Core i9-9900T is a high end power efficient desktop processor based on the Coffee Lake architecture. Compared to the similar named top model Core i9-9900K, the 9900T offers lower clock speeds (2.1 - 4.4 GHz versus 3.6 - 5 GHz) and a reduced TDP of 35 versus 95 Watt. It still offers all 8 cores and 16 threads and is intended for small chassis or laptops.

The performance is clearly behind the Core i9-9900K and more in the realm of the older 6-core Coffee Lake CPUs.

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics card is clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and offers no advantage compared to previous generations. As it is a very low end GPU, only some low demanding games like Hearthstone can be played with it (see GPU page for benchmarks).

ModelIntel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i7-13700Intel Core i9-9900T
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake-R
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700 « 2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-134002.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900KS4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-97003 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T « 2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz2100 - 5200 MHz2100 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1 MB24 MB2 MB
L3 Cache6 MB30 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 416 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 4.1 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14++ nm
Die Size126 mm2257 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2LGA 1700FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2Dual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
Architecturex86x86x86
$122 U.S.$384 U.S.$439 U.S.
Announced
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.intel.deark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
29.5 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700
49.5 pt (69%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9900T
32.7 pt (45%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 21013     avg: 25369     median: 25369 (24%)     max: 29725 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1997     avg: 2009     median: 2008.5 (85%)     max: 2020 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (46%)
min: 703     avg: 740     median: 739.5 (82%)     max: 776 Points
440 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
min: 7027     avg: 9194     median: 9194 (22%)     max: 11361 Points
2626 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (4%)
min: 2986     avg: 3692     median: 3692 (23%)     max: 4398 Points
1112 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (52%)
min: 279     avg: 285     median: 285 (86%)     max: 291 Points
185 Points (56%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (7%)
50.4 Points (66%)
12.4 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
3.5 Points (87%)
2.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (39%)
10840 Points (65%)
6758 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (13%)
82724 Points (60%)
31357 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (15%)
125536 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (10%)
16324 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
345.9 s (4%)
161.5 s (2%)
162.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
2.5 s (1%)
5.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (6%)
12289 Points (19%)
6109 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
min: 74475     avg: 91604     median: 91604 (53%)     max: 108733 MIPS
35084 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (56%)
min: 6466     avg: 6643     median: 6642.5 (79%)     max: 6819 MIPS
4894 MIPS (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (15%)
224 fps (78%)
70.3 fps (25%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
393 fps (91%)
173.4 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
min: 21.4     avg: 27.3     median: 27.3 (48%)     max: 33.1 fps
5.5 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
2.1 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (9%)
3.8 GB/s (66%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (8%)
22 GB/s (57%)
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 181     avg: 250.5     median: 250.5 (3%)     max: 320 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
min: 111     avg: 144.5     median: 144.5 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
422 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
min: 0.4075     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.423 sec
1.9 sec (41%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17194 Points (37%)
10259 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
6.4 s (1%)
8.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
13.9 s (1%)
19.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495.5 s (2%)
329.2 s (1%)
481 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
82438 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (24%)
min: 23197     avg: 26874     median: 26874 (73%)     max: 30551 Points
4080 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (56%)
96793 Points (79%)
12668 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (56%)
96083 Points (78%)
12727 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (58%)
97199 Points (82%)
13200 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
26999 Points (68%)
3268 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (16%)
min: 31032     avg: 37512     median: 37512 (67%)     max: 43992 Points
13365 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (18%)
min: 14079     avg: 16213     median: 16212.5 (68%)     max: 18346 Points
5870 Points (25%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2761 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
15882 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (49%)
min: 1958     avg: 1984     median: 1983.5 (84%)     max: 2009 Points
1206 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (7%)
min: 15525     avg: 17564     median: 17563.5 (31%)     max: 19602 Points
5888 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
1925 Points (8%)
1193 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
18964 Points (60%)
5875 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (53%)
8714 Points (87%)
5381 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (17%)
67866 Points (74%)
23223 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
min: 468     avg: 470     median: 470 (1%)     max: 472 ms
878 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 289     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (83%)     max: 290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (43%)
min: 332     avg: 338     median: 338 (70%)     max: 344 Points
197 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2017     avg: 2169     median: 2168.5 (83%)     max: 2320 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
min: 109.8     avg: 247.9     median: 247.9 (43%)     max: 386 Watt
65.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.5 Watt (19%)
min: 149.6     avg: 257.3     median: 257.3 (47%)     max: 365 Watt
57 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.49     avg: 46.1     median: 46.1 (30%)     max: 83.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)
20 Points per Watt (15%)
19.5 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700 → 320% n=39

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9900T → 117% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 17:31:48

#0 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14997 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12027 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720107108 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14997 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 14997 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12027 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#12 got single benchmarks 12027 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.096s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.096s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)