Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-9100F vs Intel Core i5-13400F

Intel Core i3-9100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-9100F

The Intel Core i3-9100F is an entry level Quad-Core processor for desktop PCs based on the Coffee Lake architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.2 GHz without HyperThreading / SMT support (4 threads only). The CPU is still manufactured in 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. 

Compared to the older Core i3-8100, the i3-9100F offers around 10 to 15 percent higher performance. Therefore, the CPU is well suited for simple office tasks but less for high end gaming or demanding applications.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor wont need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i5-13400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400F

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 10 cores. Six fast Golden Cove / Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and four Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz. The 13400F can be based on the older Alder Lake chips (at least for early models) or the newer Raptor Lake chips. The F-series of CPUs do not integrate a iGPU.

The performance is clearly higher than the old Core i5-12400F due to the additional four E-cores. These help in multi-threaded workloads and the higher boost core of the p-cores help for single threaded workloads.

The power consumption of the 13400F is rated at 65 Watt for sustained workloads (PL1) and 148 Watt for short bursts (PL2).

ModelIntel Core i3-9100FIntel Core i5-13400F
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameCoffee Lake-RRaptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz2500 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB0.1 MB
L2 Cache1 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 410 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
Die Size126 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2LGA 1700
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
Architecturex86x86
$122 U.S.$196 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
29.5 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400F
42.5 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15911 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1744 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (46%)
672 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
6091 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (4%)
2364 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (52%)
252 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (7%)
27.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (39%)
8689 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (13%)
51113 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (15%)
82988 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (10%)
13947 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
345.9 s (4%)
367.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (6%)
8602 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
60048 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (56%)
5743 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (15%)
136.9 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
314.5 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
19.2 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (9%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (8%)
12.2 GB/s (32%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
206 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13989 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495.5 s (2%)
420.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77937 Points (68%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (24%)
23820 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (56%)
77765 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (56%)
76636 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (58%)
80273 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
19846 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (16%)
28087 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (18%)
12669 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (49%)
1792 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (7%)
12095 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
1721 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
12009 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (53%)
7684 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (17%)
43856 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
535 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (43%)
294 Points (61%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1941 Points (74%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
214 Watt (37%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.5 Watt (19%)
184.2 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.3 Watt (50%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400F → 226% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 28. 06:34:54

#0 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14966 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719549294 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 12190 +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14966 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 14966 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)