Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-1305U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600H

Intel Core i3-1305U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1305U

The Intel Core i3-1305U is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Raptor Lake-U series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers one performance core (P-cores, most likely Golden Cove architecture like Alder Lake) and 4 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 6 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.6 to 4.5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.2 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 10 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be slightly higher than the old Alder Lake Pentium 8505 (max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache).

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 64 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

Power consumption

The i3 has a Base power consumption of 15 W, with 55 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (Intel 7).

AMD Ryzen 5 2600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.2 (base) - 3.6 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile graphics card with 8 CUs (512 Shaders, unverified). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 5 2500U for slim and light laptops, the 2600H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.3 versus 2 GHz) and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

The performance should be slightly better than the Ryzen 5 2600U due to the higher TDP and base clock speed. Especially longer loads should profit from this. Due to the high TDP (configurable from 35 - 54 Watt), the Ryzen 7 2600H is best suited for bigger laptops.

ModelIntel Core i3-1305UAMD Ryzen 5 2600H
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-UAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameRaptor Lake-UZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
Intel Core i7-1365U compare1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U compare0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U « 1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H « 3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1200 - 4500 MHz3200 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache464 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache10 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads5 / 64 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1700AM4
FeaturesThread DirectorXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) ( - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.com
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
812 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3226 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
819 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2741 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600H → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 02:09:59

#0 checking url part for id 14922 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10146 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720051799 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14922 +0s ... 0.003s

#7 got single benchmarks 14922 +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10146 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 10146 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.004s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.005s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.007s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)