Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-1110G4 vs Intel Processor N200

Intel Core i3-1110G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1110G4

The Intel Core i3-1110G4 is a power-efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation (UP4) that was launched in September 2020. It integrates two Willow Cove processor cores (4 threads thanks to HyperThreading). Each core can clock from 1.5 GHz (base speed at 7 Watt TDP setting) to 3.9 GHz (single- and dual-core boost). With 15 Watt TDP (cTDP-up) the base speed is 2.5 GHz.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. The i3 integrates the low end UHD Graphics G4 with 48 of the 96 EUs enabled and a clock speed of 400 - 1100 MHz. The GPU and CPU can together use the 6 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

Performance

The average 1110G4 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N5105, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is the kind of performance that entry-level chips deliver, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Intel Core i3-1110G4 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) of 7 W to 15 W, the expectation being that laptop manufacturers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. This Core i3 is built with the 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin making for decent, as of mid-2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Core i3-1110G4Intel Processor N200
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameTiger Lake-UP4Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i7-1180G7 compare2.2 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1160G7 compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1140G7 compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1130G7 compare1.8 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1120G4 compare1.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1110G4 « 2.5 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock2500 - 3900 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1598
FeaturesLPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 2 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-1110G4
26.7 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1868 Points (2%)
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
877 Points (37%)
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
422 Points (47%)
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
732 Points (2%)
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
382 Points (2%)
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
160.4 Points (48%)
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.3 Points (6%)
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6972 Points (42%)
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
13139 Points (10%)
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
520 s (6%)
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
12.4 s (3%)
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2728 Points (4%)
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8714 MIPS (5%)
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3935 MIPS (47%)
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.4 fps (7%)
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
115.6 fps (27%)
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.5 fps (4%)
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
138%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
164%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.4 GB/s (6%)
133%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1560 Seconds (11%)
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5008 Points (11%)
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.4 s (2%)
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.6 s (1%)
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
474.6 s (2%)
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3959 Points (11%)
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2886 Points (7%)
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4431 Points (8%)
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2124 Points (9%)
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
772 Points (33%)
120%
N200 +
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1894 Points (3%)
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1212 Points (5%)
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2478 Points (8%)
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5397 Points (54%)
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
10233 Points (11%)
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
862 ms (1%)
1460 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
188.4 Points (39%)
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
917 Points (35%)
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
27 Watt (5%)
102%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24.5 Watt (4%)
102%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
15.6 Points per Watt (12%)
103%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1110G4 → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 85% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:38:04

#0 checking url part for id 12738 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720078684 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12738 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 12738 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.002s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.051s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)