Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i5-10200H

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Core i5-10200H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP65 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200BGA1440
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$162 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
32.2 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (6%)
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (50%)
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (51%)
419 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (6%)
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (6%)
842 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (57%)
171.6 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (15%)
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
4497 MIPS (54%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (21%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (14%)
6.5 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (28%)
6233 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (51%)
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (24%)
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (18%)
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (51%)
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (46%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (9%)
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
882 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (47%)
187.3 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (7%)
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 86% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:33:25

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719934405 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.052s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)