Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10110Y vs Intel Core i7-8750H

Intel Core i3-10110Y

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10110Y

The Intel Core i3-10110Y is an extremely power efficient dual-core SoC for small laptops and tablets that was announced in August 2019. The faster models, like the Core i5-10310Y offer two additional cores however.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 10110Y as of August 2023, we have tested at least one laptop utilizing the 10100Y, an insignificantly slower chip (Amber Lake, 2 cores, 4 threads, up to 3.9 GHz.) Based on that, expect the 10110Y to be noticeably faster than the AMD 3050e. Performance of this kind is totally sufficient for basic day-to-day activities, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel UHD Graphics 615 and runs at 300 - 1000 MHz in the i3. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder.

The TDP is specified at 7 Watts but can be varied from 5.5 to 9 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). Interestingly, the faster Core i5-10210Y with two more cores can be configured to lower 4.5 Watt.

Intel Core i7-8750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8750H

The Intel Core i7-8750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.2 and 4.1 GHz (4 GHz with 4 cores, 3.9 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Core i3-10110YIntel Core i7-8750H
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y compare1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y « 1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H « 2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock1000 - 4000 MHz2200 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB384 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB9 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 46 / 12
TDP7 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1377FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8750H
31.2 pt (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 403     avg: 411.8     median: 412.5 (46%)     max: 418 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2142     avg: 2377     median: 2336.5 (6%)     max: 2707 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 863     avg: 1113     median: 1116 (7%)     max: 1251 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 172     median: 173 (52%)     max: 177 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.54     avg: 12.2     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 13.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.89     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6236     avg: 6479     median: 6471 (39%)     max: 6645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 29664     avg: 33163     median: 33595 (24%)     max: 35307 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33944     avg: 42290     median: 43494 (30%)     max: 46384 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8472     avg: 8542     median: 8498 (10%)     max: 8665 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 125.5     avg: 157.5     median: 156.8 (2%)     max: 180.5 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.35     avg: 7.1     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 16.26 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5310 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 28826     avg: 30674     median: 31144 (18%)     max: 33257 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4599     avg: 4621     median: 4629 (55%)     max: 4630 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 64.2     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (23%)     max: 70.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 193.5     avg: 200.3     median: 200.3 (46%)     max: 207.1 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.56     avg: 8.2     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 9.55 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7 GB/s (18%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 395.5     avg: 456.2     median: 469.3 (3%)     max: 485.9 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7531     avg: 10078     median: 10294.5 (22%)     max: 10832 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.98     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 9.45 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.26     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.39 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 509     avg: 524     median: 524 (2%)     max: 537 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 27882     avg: 36281     median: 37117 (32%)     max: 41516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7869     avg: 11044     median: 11474.5 (31%)     max: 13112 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 43026     avg: 55905     median: 56773 (46%)     max: 58897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51146     avg: 56438     median: 56720 (46%)     max: 58704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 57714     median: 57465.5 (48%)     max: 60233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4876     avg: 9924     median: 10149 (26%)     max: 11320 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8551     avg: 15199     median: 15533 (28%)     max: 17219 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2859     avg: 5724     median: 5858 (25%)     max: 7037 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
996 Points (42%)
1050 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1633 Points (3%)
4820 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4669     avg: 4982     median: 5040 (50%)     max: 5146 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17709     avg: 21069     median: 21648 (24%)     max: 23313 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4548     avg: 4839     median: 4868.5 (66%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17048     avg: 19665     median: 19875 (48%)     max: 22006 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20725     avg: 21871     median: 21920 (39%)     max: 22665 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3734     avg: 3995     median: 4008 (78%)     max: 4163 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 695     avg: 1108     median: 1124 (1%)     max: 1272 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.5     avg: 82.3     median: 83 (1%)     max: 85.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27460     avg: 34108     median: 34163 (30%)     max: 44549 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
213 Points (44%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 0     avg: 67.1     median: 90.4 (16%)     max: 111 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 97     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 8.19     avg: 21     median: 12.6 (9%)     max: 42.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10110Y → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8750H → 200% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 16:54:39

#0 checking url part for id 11469 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9576 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719932079 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11469 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 11469 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9576 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 9576 +0.104s ... 0.118s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.162s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.165s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)