Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100Y vs Intel Core i7-7820HK vs Intel Core m3-8100Y

Intel Core i3-10100Y

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100Y

The Intel Core i3-10100Y is a efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled laptops based on the old Amber Lake generation from 2018. It was announced in Q1 2021 and is similar to the old Core i5-8200Y. The only difference is a slightly higher GPU clock (+50 MHz).

The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.3 - 3.9 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The average 10100Y in our database is just a little ahead of the AMD 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, the latter being an entry-level, dual-core processor of the same energy efficiency based on the Zen architecture. This makes the Core i3 an OK option for basic day-to-day activities, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 615 iGPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) not unlike the older HD Graphics 515 and runs at up to 1,000 MHz. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power consumption

This little Core i3 here has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 5 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 3.5 W and 7 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, the values are low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs and handhelds.

The i3-10100Y is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel manufacturing processes for low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-7820HK

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7820HK

The Intel Core i7-7820HK is a fast quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest model of the consumer series at the time of the announcement. Only the i7-7920HQ and Xeon E3-1535M v6 are faster. Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 2.9 - 3.9 GHz (4 cores up to 3.5 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.7 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to the Core i7-7820HQ, the 7820HK lacks business features like vPro or TXT support.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the higher clock speeds, the performance of the i7-7820HK is slightly faster than the old Skylake top model Core i7-6920HQ (2.9 - 3.8 GHz). The performance is sufficient even for very demanding tasks and on par with powerful desktop quad-core processors.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

Intel Core m3-8100Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core m3-8100Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. The CPU consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.1 - 3.4 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder.  Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core m3-7Y32), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the old 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100YIntel Core i7-7820HKIntel Core m3-8100Y
SeriesIntel Amber LakeIntel Kaby LakeIntel Amber Lake
CodenameAmber Lake-YKaby LakeAmber Lake-Y
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK « 2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y « 1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz2900 - 3900 MHz1100 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 82 / 4
TDP5 Watt45 Watt5 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1377BGA
FeaturesDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$378 U.S.$281 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10100Y
23 pt (32%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - m3-8100Y
20.2 pt (28%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1375 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
788 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
303 Points (34%)
min: 232     avg: 257.7     median: 243 (27%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
536 Points (1%)
min: 382     avg: 440.7     median: 413 (1%)     max: 527 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
220 Points (1%)
min: 689     avg: 773     median: 770 (5%)     max: 867 Points
min: 157     avg: 190.8     median: 179.5 (1%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
122 Points (37%)
min: 156     avg: 162.7     median: 162 (49%)     max: 171 Points
min: 91     avg: 101.3     median: 96.6 (29%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.5 Points (3%)
min: 8.34     avg: 8.6     median: 8.4 (11%)     max: 9.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (35%)
min: 1.69     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (46%)     max: 1.85 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5292 Points (32%)
min: 6062     avg: 6231     median: 6182 (37%)     max: 6566 Points
3850 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9659 Points (7%)
min: 22793     avg: 23622     median: 23046.5 (17%)     max: 26081 Points
6055 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 32769     avg: 34129.5     median: 34129.5 (24%)     max: 35490 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8465     avg: 8558.5     median: 8558.5 (10%)     max: 8652 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
632 s (7%)
min: 179.4     avg: 234.7     median: 214.3 (3%)     max: 330.9 s
906 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16 s (3%)
min: 6.668     avg: 10.4     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 17.8 s
18.6 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
215.4 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
17.8 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1683 Points (3%)
min: 5114     avg: 5135     median: 5134.5 (8%)     max: 5155 Points
1646 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
8262 MIPS (5%)
min: 4937     avg: 6246     median: 6245.5 (4%)     max: 7554 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3535 MIPS (42%)
min: 2683     avg: 2983     median: 2982.5 (36%)     max: 3282 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 46     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (16%)     max: 47.8 fps
11.2 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 177     avg: 178.8     median: 178.8 (41%)     max: 180.6 fps
58.3 fps (13%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2 fps (4%)
min: 1.42     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.96 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.416     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.609 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (6%)
min: 0.71     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.831 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
min: 3.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.2 (11%)     max: 4.3 GB/s
1.7 GB/s (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1825 Seconds (13%)
min: 1893     avg: 2206     median: 2206 (16%)     max: 2519 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1 sec (21%)
min: 0.942     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (23%)     max: 1.204 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7957     avg: 8098     median: 8038 (17%)     max: 8360 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.7 s (2%)
min: 9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (2%)     max: 10.5 s
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.67     avg: 21.7     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23.5 s
29.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
667 s (3%)
min: 490.5     avg: 529     median: 535 (2%)     max: 550 s
818 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
30280 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3210 Points (9%)
min: 9542     avg: 10034     median: 10019 (27%)     max: 10523 Points
min: 2165     avg: 2747     median: 2579.5 (7%)     max: 3665 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51307     avg: 53563     median: 52699.5 (43%)     max: 59600 Points
min: 24135     avg: 26883     median: 26882.5 (22%)     max: 29630 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50796     avg: 53623     median: 52515.5 (43%)     max: 59482 Points
min: 20632     avg: 22076     median: 22076 (18%)     max: 23520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 51327     avg: 54058     median: 52784.5 (44%)     max: 60127 Points
min: 18736     avg: 26552     median: 26177 (22%)     max: 34742 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7905     avg: 8141     median: 8001.5 (20%)     max: 9050 Points
min: 1941     avg: 2084     median: 1968 (5%)     max: 2460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11041     avg: 11381     median: 11174 (20%)     max: 12592 Points
min: 2692     avg: 2986     median: 2837.5 (5%)     max: 3577 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4259     avg: 4439     median: 4447 (19%)     max: 4568 Points
min: 943     avg: 1061     median: 992 (4%)     max: 1248 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
986 Points (42%)
min: 809     avg: 846     median: 845.5 (36%)     max: 882 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1889 Points (3%)
min: 1178     avg: 1397     median: 1396.5 (3%)     max: 1615 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1279 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4359 Points (44%)
min: 4841     avg: 4897     median: 4896.5 (49%)     max: 4952 Points
4159 Points (42%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7643 Points (8%)
min: 15838     avg: 16002     median: 16001.5 (18%)     max: 16165 Points
6934 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4867     avg: 4905     median: 4904.5 (67%)     max: 4942 Points
4043 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15042     avg: 15309     median: 15308.5 (37%)     max: 15575 Points
6676 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14323     avg: 15088     median: 14476 (26%)     max: 16465 Points
5446 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3718     avg: 4002     median: 3926 (77%)     max: 4361 Points
2702 Points (53%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
14990 Points (23%)
5958 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3885 Points (58%)
3081 Points (46%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8823 Points (71%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
6189 Points (56%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5047 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6364 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6113 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1246 ms (1%)
min: 901     avg: 2277     median: 984 (1%)     max: 7545 ms
min: 1295     avg: 1652     median: 1715 (2%)     max: 2163 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 68.3     avg: 138.2     median: 71.1 (1%)     max: 400.9 ms
min: 117.4     avg: 211     median: 211 (2%)     max: 304.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
34086 Points (30%)
min: 35189     avg: 38766     median: 39000 (34%)     max: 40652 Points
min: 14701     avg: 21429     median: 20267 (18%)     max: 29318 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
148 Points (31%)
min: 128     avg: 134.5     median: 135.5 (28%)     max: 139 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5961 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
25599 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9760 Points (64%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13598 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
18.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100Y → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7820HK → 181% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core m3-8100Y → 87% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 23:57:29

#0 checking url part for id 13831 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8415 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10086 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720043849 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13831 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 13831 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8415 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 8415 +0.018s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10086 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#12 got single benchmarks 10086 +0.008s ... 0.038s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.047s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.048s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.067s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.094s

#18 return log +0s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)