Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100F vs AMD E-240 vs Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i3-10100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100F

The Intel Core i3-10100F is an entry level quad-core processor for desktop PCs based on the Comet Lake-S architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz with HyperThreading / SMT support (8 threads). The CPU is still manufactured on 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. Compared to the older Coffee Lake Core i3-9100F, the i3-10100F offers a 100 MHz higher Boost speed, HyperThreading and support for faster DDR4 memory (2666 MHz).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 10100F as of August 2023, it's reasonable to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i5-10200H.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor won't need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100FAMD E-240Intel Core i5-10400F
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD E-SeriesIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet LakeZacateComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz1500 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB64 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB1.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 81 / 16 / 12
TDP65 Watt18 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm40 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm275 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200FT1 BGA 413-BallLGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
Architecturex86x86x86
$122 U.S.$155 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
438 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1332 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
180 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-240 +
0.3 Points (0%)
5535%
1 i5-10400F +
14.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
6719 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36564 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (1%)     max: 1043 Points
8849 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E-240 +
4472 s (53%)
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E-240 +
137.4 s (28%)
6.3 s (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5064 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81.2 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
228.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
11.2 fps (20%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (1%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E-240 +
57.5 s (12%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E-240 +
120.3 s (5%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
470.4 s (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E-240 +
2.5 Points (32%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-240 +
269 Points (1%)
5405%
1 i5-10400F +
14539 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
62086 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1072 Points (45%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3650 Points (7%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
215 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100F → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 05:40:08

#0 checking url part for id 12774 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719891608 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12774 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12774 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#12 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.05s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)