Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Core i7-1365U

Intel Atom x7-Z8700

► remove from comparison Intel Z8700

The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom Z3795, the Atom x7-Z8700 offers about 5 percent more performance and is similar fast as an AMD A6-6210 APU or high-end ARM SoCs, e.g. the Snapdragon 810 or Exynos 7420.

Using Windows, the performance is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance somewhere between the Qualcomm Adreno 330 / PowerVR G6430 and the Adreno 420 / PowerVR GX6450.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Core i7-1365U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1365U

The Intel Core i7-1365U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-U / RPL-U series). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.8 to 5.2 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.3 to 3.9 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports all "Enterprise" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the high clock speed, the Core i7-1365U should perform slightly better than the older core i7-1265U (up to 4.8 GHz).

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-6400. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU still only supports PCIe 4.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.3 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i7 CPU is rated at a TDP of 15W (base power, PL1) and a maximum turbo power of 55W (PL2). The RPL-U processors are built in a further improved Intel 7 process (10nm SuperFin) that allows higher clock rates.

ModelIntel Atom x7-Z8700Intel Core i7-1365U
SeriesIntel Atom x7Intel Raptor Lake-U
CodenameCherry TrailRaptor Lake-U
Series: Raptor Lake-U Raptor Lake-U
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 compare1.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core i7-1365U « 1.3 - 5.2 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1355U compare1.2 - 5 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1345U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1335U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1334U compare0.9 - 4.6 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1315U compare0.9 - 4.5 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1305U compare1.2 - 4.5 GHz5 / 6 cores10 MB L3
Intel Processor U300 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Clock1600 - 2400 MHz1300 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB9.5 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 410 / 12
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 2x PCIe 2.0Thread Director
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache928 KB
L3 Cache12 MB
TDP15 Watt
SocketBGA1700

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1365U
41 pt (57%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7532     avg: 8750     median: 8946 (8%)     max: 9576 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1877     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (80%)     max: 1891 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 703     avg: 724     median: 726.5 (81%)     max: 741 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2902     avg: 3391     median: 3495.5 (9%)     max: 3669 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 98     avg: 116     median: 116 (1%)     max: 134 Points
min: 1348     avg: 1471     median: 1466.5 (9%)     max: 1604 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 37     avg: 37.5     median: 37.5 (11%)     max: 38 Points
min: 261     avg: 265     median: 265.5 (80%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.72     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.36     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1003     avg: 1114     median: 1114 (7%)     max: 1225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1876     avg: 3116     median: 3116 (2%)     max: 4356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
2458 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
1311 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8700 +
24.5 s (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 33476     avg: 38339     median: 39727 (23%)     max: 40424 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5722     avg: 5841     median: 5850.5 (70%)     max: 5941 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z8700 +
10.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z8700 +
50.8 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.61     avg: 9.6     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 10.3 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 660     avg: 727     median: 726.5 (9%)     max: 796 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 373     avg: 395.3     median: 383 (3%)     max: 430 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4504     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4586 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z8700 +
49.8 s (11%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z8700 +
96.7 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 493     avg: 1186     median: 1186 (3%)     max: 1879 Points
min: 11465     avg: 12579     median: 12071.5 (33%)     max: 14708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z8700 +
2570 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
237 Points (1%)
10387 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15179     avg: 16981     median: 17182 (31%)     max: 18379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5497     avg: 6435     median: 6438.5 (27%)     max: 7364 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2583 Points (70%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9605 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1841     avg: 1884     median: 1878.5 (79%)     max: 1938 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8272     avg: 8565     median: 8605.5 (15%)     max: 8778 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1797     avg: 1813     median: 1812.5 (8%)     max: 1828 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8334     avg: 8500     median: 8500 (27%)     max: 8666 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3300 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
970 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3350 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
990 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z8700 +
2675 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z8700 +
2440 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z8700 +
3867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z8700 +
3767 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
3427 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4370 ms (5%)
min: 487     avg: 493.5     median: 494 (1%)     max: 499 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8700 +
348.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
8408 Points (7%)
93596 Points (82%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 261     avg: 263     median: 262.5 (75%)     max: 266 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 290     avg: 298.8     median: 300 (63%)     max: 305 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1605     avg: 1638     median: 1636 (63%)     max: 1675 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35.5     avg: 41.3     median: 41.3 (7%)     max: 47.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 53.6     median: 53.5 (10%)     max: 60.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.69     avg: 6.5     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 9.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.84     avg: 5.3     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.47 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 25.8     avg: 27.6     median: 26.5 (20%)     max: 30.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8700 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1365U → 1432% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 16:34:10

#0 checking url part for id 6670 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14914 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720103650 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6670 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 6670 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14914 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 14914 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.051s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)