Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

AMD Radeon RX Vega 2

► remove from comparison AMD Vega 2

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 is an integrated GPU for laptops. It is used for the entry level Athlon Silver 3050U APUs, which were launched in early 2020. The GPU is based on the Vega architecture (5th generation GCN) and has 2 CUs (= 128 of the 704 shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The performance depends on the configured TDP (12-25 W at launch), the clocks, the cooling, and the memory configuration). The GPU should benefit from fast dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM (contrary to DDR4-2133 single-channel, which is also possible).

The Vega architecture offers some improvements over the Polaris generation and now supports DirectX 12 Feature Level 12_1. More information is available in our dedicated article about the Raven Ridge architecture.

The performance should be clearly lower than the Radeon RX Vega 3 with 3 CUs and therefore in the lowest performance region of modern GPUs. That means, demanding current games may not be playable fluently.

Thanks to the 12nm process and clever power-saving features, the power consumption is comparatively low (according to AMD), so the graphics card can also be used for slim and light notebooks.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics 617

The Intel UHD Graphics 617 (GT2) is a low-end integrated graphics unit, which can be found in the Y-series of the Amber-Lake generation. This "GT2" version offers 24 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at up to 1050 MHz (depending on the CPU model). Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the UHD 617 has to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L/LPDDR3). Compared to the old HD Graphics 615 in Kaby-Lake-Y CPUs, the UHD 617 is the same GPU with slightly different clock speeds (depending on the model) and slight power/performance improvements due to the improved 14nm++ process. Compared to the similar UHD Graphics 615 in other Amber Lake models, the 617 looks to be higher clocked (+50 MHz) and has more headroom due to the higher TDP of 7 versus 5 Watt.

Performance

The 3D performance of the UHD 617 depends on the CPU model and the cooling / TDP-setting of the laptop. Furthermore, the used main memory (single channel, DDR3(L), amount) is influencing performance. On average the UHD graphics 617 should be very similar to the Kaby-Lake HD Graphics 615 due to the same architecture and similar speeds. That means that only low demanding games like Farming Simulator 17 or Rocket League are playable in lowest detail settings.

Features

The revised video engine in the HD 615 and UHD 615 / 617 now supports H.265/HEVC Main10 profile in hardware with 10 bit colors. Furthermore, Googles VP9 codec can also be hardware decoded. The UHD 617 should support HDCP 2.2 and therefore Netflix 4K. HDMI 2.0 however is still only supported with an external converter chip (LSPCon).

Power Consumption

The UHD Graphics 617 can be found in Y processors with 7 W TDP  and is therefore suited for very thin, mostly passively cooled subnotebooks like the MacBook Air 2018.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card that was first seen in the Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) in mid 2019. It is similar to the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in the 28 Watt CPUs.

The so called GT3e version of the Coffee-Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1150 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 645 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 645 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8557U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used for 15-Watt processor and therefore small-sized notebooks.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 2Intel UHD Graphics 617Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Gen. 9.5 Series
Vega 10 640 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 9 576 @ 1.3 GHz
Vega 8 512 @ 1.2 GHz
Vega 6 384 @ 1.1 GHz
Vega 3 192 @ 0.6 - 1.2 GHz
Vega 2 128 @ 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 655 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameVega Raven RidgeKaby-Lake GT2Kaby Lake GT3e
ArchitectureVegaGen. 9 Amber LakeGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Pipelines128 - unified24 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed1100 (Boost) MHz300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynoyesyes
APIDirectX 12_1DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption15 Watt
Transistors4.5 Billion
technology12 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesTiled Rasterization, Shared Memory (up to Dual-Channel DDR4-2400)QuickSyncQuickSync
Date of Announcement07.01.2018 30.10.2018 10.07.2019
Memory Bus Width64/128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3L/LPDDR3DDR3, DDR4
CPU in Vega 2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W? MHz1100 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics 617GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-10510Y4 x 1200 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8210Y2 x 1600 MHz, 7 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 - ? MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8557U4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8257U4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 - ? MHz1050 - 1150 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 322     avg: 338.3     median: 337 (1%)     max: 356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 286     avg: 299     median: 300 (1%)     max: 311 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
77156 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4841 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
7231 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 845     avg: 890     median: 889.5 (2%)     max: 934 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 947     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 Vega 2 +
3110 Points (3%)
3711 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 Vega 2 +
3450 Points (1%)
4496 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1632     avg: 1672     median: 1671.5 (2%)     max: 1711 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1509     avg: 1541     median: 1540.5 (1%)     max: 1572 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 617
3DMark 06
8662 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 34.7     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (2%)     max: 43.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
min: 55.3     avg: 67.1     median: 67.1 (4%)     max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 617
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
101.8 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
198.3 fps (2%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX Vega 2 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 617 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
20.2  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
37.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
14.1  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.1  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
12.8  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.5  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
61.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
26  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
18.3  fps
low 1024x768
UHD Graphics 617:
16.1  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
67.2  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
76.5  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 617:
28.2  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
57.3  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
14.6  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
13.6  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.9  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 617:
47.6  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
104.6  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 617:
27.9  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
60  fps
high 1366x768
UHD Graphics 617:
25  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
51.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 617:
8.4  fps
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.1  fps
Intel UHD Graphics 617lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1120.214.112.8
Rocket League61.22618.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider16.1
Dota 2 Reborn67.228.214.613.6
BioShock Infinite47.627.9258.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1
2
4


4


2








Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645lowmed.highultraQHD4K
X-Plane 11.1137.426.122.5
Dota 2 Reborn76.557.32926.9
BioShock Infinite104.66051.622.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
1
1
1
2
1

2








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 26. 21:35:50

#0 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9356 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9902 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719430550 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:40 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0.028s ... 0.058s

#9 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.007s ... 0.065s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9356 +0s ... 0.065s

#11 got single benchmarks 9356 +0.004s ... 0.069s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0s ... 0.07s

#13 got single benchmarks 9902 +0.004s ... 0.073s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.086s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.086s

#17 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.09s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.09s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.09s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.091s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.091s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)