Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Intel Core i9-13905H

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 185H

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is the top-of-the-line Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 6, are SMT-enabled and run at up to 5.1 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.35 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while the rest of the chip is turned off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes that this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 9 185H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 185H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official Intel performance data, then the 185H is not a whole lot faster than the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.35 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is about as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 9 series processor has a "base" power consumption of 45 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. A powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 185H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i9-13905H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13905H

The Intel Core i9-13905H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Similar to the i9-13900H but without vPro support and the 13905H uses a different package and socket.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i9-13905H is (together with the 13900HK) the fastest 45W CPU for laptops and only bested by Raptor Lake-HX based models with more cores and improved P-cores (e.g., the i9-13980HX). Still, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Core i9-13905H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HRaptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
14 / 20
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FCBGA1792
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enterprise, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHAThread Director
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 9 185H
44.2 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13905H
42.9 pt (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 108     avg: 109     median: 109 (76%)     max: 110 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 828     avg: 948     median: 947.5 (18%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 12688     avg: 17445     median: 18177 (17%)     max: 19851 Points
min: 17880     avg: 19384     median: 20034 (19%)     max: 20237 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1620     avg: 1803     median: 1810.5 (77%)     max: 1906 Points
min: 1652     avg: 1901     median: 2020 (86%)     max: 2030 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 694     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 735 Points
min: 622     avg: 679     median: 639 (71%)     max: 775 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4843     avg: 6712     median: 7138.5 (17%)     max: 7651 Points
min: 6462     avg: 7028     median: 7152 (17%)     max: 7469 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1581.9     avg: 2669     median: 2777.5 (18%)     max: 3165 Points
min: 2676     avg: 2821     median: 2857 (18%)     max: 2931 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 238     avg: 262.8     median: 264.5 (80%)     max: 280 Points
min: 235     avg: 255.3     median: 246 (74%)     max: 285 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
34 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10300 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59935 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88902 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14374 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 292.1     avg: 366.7     median: 366.7 (4%)     max: 441.275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.254     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 8.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7940     avg: 12898     median: 12898 (20%)     max: 17856 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 52522     avg: 67897     median: 69924 (40%)     max: 76331 MIPS
min: 68880     avg: 71701     median: 69892 (40%)     max: 76332 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4502     avg: 5381     median: 5524.5 (66%)     max: 5781 MIPS
min: 4871     avg: 5487     median: 5520 (66%)     max: 6069 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.2 fps (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
335.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 14.1     avg: 19.5     median: 20.8 (37%)     max: 22.7 fps
min: 20.5     avg: 21.5     median: 21.2 (37%)     max: 22.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (28%)     max: 1.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.9     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (25%)     max: 11.3 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 285     avg: 357.4     median: 327.5 (4%)     max: 538 Seconds
min: 280     avg: 296     median: 302 (4%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 201.3     median: 190 (1%)     max: 285 Seconds
min: 163     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
min: 0.4178     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4974 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9854     avg: 11420     median: 11420 (24%)     max: 12986 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.6     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.751 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
304.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
80494 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12693     avg: 20942     median: 21875 (59%)     max: 24629 Points
min: 22494     avg: 23911     median: 23894 (65%)     max: 25346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75240     avg: 75478     median: 75478 (61%)     max: 75716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 75340     avg: 75417     median: 75417 (61%)     max: 75494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78677     avg: 84868     median: 84868 (71%)     max: 91059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17876     avg: 18479     median: 18664 (47%)     max: 18896 Points
21588 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 21106     avg: 27129     median: 27113 (48%)     max: 30623 Points
min: 27625     avg: 29475     median: 29193 (52%)     max: 31606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6307     avg: 10831     median: 11696 (49%)     max: 12209 Points
min: 12800     avg: 13567     median: 13653 (58%)     max: 14249 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2459     median: 2499 (67%)     max: 2570 Points
2404 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12825     avg: 13697     median: 13864 (55%)     max: 14160 Points
14212 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1700     avg: 1825     median: 1847.5 (78%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1672     avg: 1774     median: 1685 (71%)     max: 1966 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10441     avg: 13019     median: 13109 (23%)     max: 14230 Points
min: 13661     avg: 14122     median: 13707 (25%)     max: 14999 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1821     avg: 1826     median: 1825.5 (8%)     max: 1830 Points
1898 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13228     avg: 13600     median: 13600 (43%)     max: 13972 Points
14690 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7602 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
47960 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 494     avg: 524     median: 517 (1%)     max: 594 ms
min: 465     avg: 522     median: 545 (1%)     max: 557 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 90543     avg: 94193     median: 93980 (83%)     max: 98055 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 260.6     median: 267.3 (77%)     max: 269 Points
min: 243     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (76%)     max: 288 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 237     avg: 281.5     median: 292 (61%)     max: 295 Points
min: 267     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1589     avg: 1757     median: 1736.5 (67%)     max: 1971 Points
min: 1774     avg: 1884     median: 1883.5 (72%)     max: 1993 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 44.4     avg: 112.9     median: 125.7 (22%)     max: 176.1 Watt
min: 139.4     avg: 140     median: 140 (24%)     max: 140.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 88     avg: 138.3     median: 154.9 (28%)     max: 171.8 Watt
168.6 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.87     avg: 11.2     median: 11.4 (8%)     max: 19.2 Watt
min: 16     avg: 16.6     median: 16.6 (11%)     max: 17.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.7     avg: 15.4     median: 13.1 (14%)     max: 28.8 Watt
min: 11.7     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (17%)     max: 19.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.8     avg: 30.5     median: 24.3 (18%)     max: 67 Points per Watt
16.9 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 9 185H → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13905H → 103% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 16:36:53

#0 checking url part for id 16921 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14983 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719931012 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16921 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 16921 +0.017s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14983 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#9 got single benchmarks 14983 +0.007s ... 0.039s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.086s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)