Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core i7-11370H vs Intel Core i7-11390H

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core i7-11370H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-11370H

The Intel Core i7-11370H is a quad-core SoC designed for use in ultra-thin gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 generation and was announced early 2021. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 3 (28 W TDP) to 3.3 GHz (35 W). The boost of a single and two cores under load can reach up to 4.8 GHz. All four cores can reach up to 4.3 GHz. The 11370H can use the whole 12 MB level 3 cache.

The SoC also includes the improved Iris Xe iGPU with all 96 EUs active clocked at up to 1350 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11370H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 4500U, a noticeably less power-hungry chip, in multi-thread performance. Disregard the Core i7 moniker; this is essentially a mid-range CPU and no match for the likes of the Core i7-11800H or the Ryzen 9 5900HS.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the TUF Dash F15 FX516PR is among the fastest laptops powered by the 11370H that we know of. It can be around 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

The Core i7 has a default TDP of 28 W to 35 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's way too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i7-11370H is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-11390H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-11390H

The Intel Core i7-11390H is a high-end quad-core SoC for thin and light gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 generation and was announced in mid-2021 as a refresh. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 2.9 (28 W TDP) to 3.4 GHz (35 W). Compared to the i7-11375H, the 11390H can now also boost with two cores up to 5 GHz and all four cores can reach a 300 MHz higher clock speed of 4.6 GHz. Both i7 use the whole 12 MB level 3 cache.

The SoC also includes the improved Xe iGPU with all 96 EUs enabled clocked at up to 1400 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11390H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U and the Intel Core i7-10710U in multi-thread performance to be a decent mid-range chip, as of late 2021 - provided one isn't too picky when it comes to load times.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP of 28 W to 35 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, a proper coolu\ing solution is a must.

The CPU is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm manufacturing process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core i7-11370HIntel Core i7-11390H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameMeteor Lake-HTiger Lake-H35Tiger Lake-H35
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-H35
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H « 3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H « 3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz3300 - 4800 MHz3400 - 5000 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA1449BGA1449
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache5 MB5 MB
$426 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
42 pt (58%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-11370H
35.7 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-11390H
36.6 pt (51%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 2.2     avg: 88.6     median: 102.5 (71%)     max: 107.2 Points
92 Points (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 6.94     avg: 718     median: 752 (14%)     max: 1024 Points
323 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9769     avg: 14809     median: 14712.5 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 3696     avg: 5563     median: 5712.5 (5%)     max: 6646 Points
min: 4570     avg: 5622     median: 5917 (5%)     max: 6379 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1496     avg: 1722     median: 1745.5 (74%)     max: 1801 Points
min: 1081     avg: 1469     median: 1507 (64%)     max: 1556 Points
min: 1407     avg: 1537     median: 1602 (68%)     max: 1602 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 666     median: 670.5 (75%)     max: 693 Points
min: 475     avg: 566     median: 589 (65%)     max: 601 Points
min: 550     avg: 595     median: 614 (68%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3798     avg: 5736     median: 5645.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 1438     avg: 2146     median: 2199 (5%)     max: 2578 Points
min: 1767     avg: 2138     median: 2284 (6%)     max: 2362 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1932     avg: 2426     median: 2428.5 (15%)     max: 2857.55 Points
min: 606     avg: 946     median: 960 (6%)     max: 1086 Points
min: 775     avg: 923     median: 953 (6%)     max: 1041 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 248.4     median: 255 (77%)     max: 268 Points
min: 162.9     avg: 220.1     median: 229 (69%)     max: 233 Points
min: 209     avg: 226.7     median: 232 (70%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.98     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (41%)     max: 33.49 Points
10.7 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.07     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (77%)     max: 3.13 Points
2.8 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9828     avg: 9874     median: 9873.5 (60%)     max: 9919 Points
9604 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 56242     avg: 58357     median: 58357 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
29456 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 54366     median: 54365.5 (38%)     max: 95005 Points
39426 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13938     avg: 48020     median: 48020 (58%)     max: 82102 Points
12516 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
139.6 s (2%)
196.9 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
6.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7084     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (12%)     max: 7723 Points
min: 6144     avg: 6375     median: 6374.5 (10%)     max: 6605 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 42601     avg: 58514     median: 59879.5 (34%)     max: 70074 MIPS
min: 18961     avg: 25340     median: 26791 (15%)     max: 28520 MIPS
min: 20822     avg: 24957     median: 25876 (15%)     max: 28173 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5037     avg: 5343     median: 5398 (65%)     max: 5540 MIPS
min: 5074     avg: 5290     median: 5307 (63%)     max: 5550 MIPS
min: 5539     avg: 5705     median: 5682 (68%)     max: 5895 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 128.04     avg: 141.1     median: 141.1 (49%)     max: 154.15 fps
min: 55.2     avg: 58.6     median: 58.6 (20%)     max: 61.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 303.8     median: 303.8 (70%)     max: 325 fps
min: 214.5     avg: 232.3     median: 232.3 (54%)     max: 250.1 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.93     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 4.98     avg: 7.2     median: 7.7 (14%)     max: 8.82 fps
min: 5.84     avg: 7.1     median: 7.6 (13%)     max: 7.86 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1 GB/s
min: 0.509     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.62 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
min: 0.838     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (16%)     max: 0.98 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.2     avg: 10.4     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.6 GB/s
min: 5.4     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (16%)     max: 6.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 296     avg: 423.2     median: 398 (5%)     max: 637 Seconds
783 Seconds (10%)
min: 943     avg: 1101     median: 1101 (14%)     max: 1259 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 178     avg: 236.2     median: 226 (2%)     max: 349 Seconds
min: 432     avg: 531     median: 491 (3%)     max: 762 Seconds
min: 495     avg: 558     median: 513 (4%)     max: 665 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4609     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.526 sec
min: 0.544     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
min: 0.537     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.571 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13097 Points (28%)
10019 Points (21%)
min: 10089     avg: 10151     median: 10150.5 (22%)     max: 10212 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.046     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.168 s
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 6.842 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.767     avg: 16     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 16.125 s
min: 14.6     avg: 14.7     median: 14.7 (1%)     max: 14.733 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.754     avg: 397.5     median: 397.5 (2%)     max: 400.292 s
min: 348.305     avg: 349.8     median: 349.8 (2%)     max: 351.3 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 62245     avg: 68433     median: 68432.5 (60%)     max: 74620 Points
min: 33890     avg: 34012     median: 34012 (30%)     max: 34134 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6531     avg: 17980     median: 19912 (54%)     max: 23598 Points
min: 9920     avg: 11762     median: 11719 (32%)     max: 13296 Points
min: 7311     avg: 10440     median: 10604 (29%)     max: 13242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 72535     median: 74001.5 (60%)     max: 85435 Points
min: 30507     avg: 49576     median: 39856 (32%)     max: 70781 Points
min: 9451     avg: 46134     median: 52957 (43%)     max: 75994 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
66925 Points (54%)
min: 39681     avg: 49084     median: 39698 (32%)     max: 67872 Points
min: 9451     avg: 31285     median: 31284.5 (25%)     max: 53118 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 47633     avg: 66145     median: 71560 (60%)     max: 73828 Points
min: 64799     avg: 65805     median: 65804.5 (55%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7073     avg: 15232     median: 16405 (42%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 8702     avg: 9617     median: 9727 (25%)     max: 10322 Points
min: 8079     avg: 8821     median: 8292.5 (21%)     max: 10618 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5249     avg: 22143     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 9829     avg: 13876     median: 14499 (26%)     max: 15138 Points
min: 9456     avg: 11705     median: 10814 (19%)     max: 15737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3922     avg: 8632     median: 9311.5 (39%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 3487     avg: 5096     median: 5465.5 (23%)     max: 5811 Points
min: 3391     avg: 4236     median: 4598 (19%)     max: 4719 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1901     avg: 2381     median: 2412 (65%)     max: 2459 Points
min: 2114     avg: 2194     median: 2194 (59%)     max: 2274 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 7732     avg: 12305     median: 12508 (49%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 5066     avg: 5630     median: 5630 (22%)     max: 6194 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1462     avg: 1756     median: 1766 (75%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1376     avg: 1540     median: 1556.5 (66%)     max: 1607 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1599     median: 1615.5 (68%)     max: 1677 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10017     avg: 12023     median: 12218.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 3828     avg: 5258     median: 5388 (10%)     max: 6115 Points
min: 4457     avg: 5306     median: 5235.5 (9%)     max: 6297 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1684     avg: 1712     median: 1708 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
1380 Points (6%)
1655 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11684     avg: 12163     median: 12366 (39%)     max: 12438 Points
4911 Points (15%)
5025 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6838     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (69%)     max: 6927 Points
min: 7105     avg: 7126     median: 7125.5 (71%)     max: 7146 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 43897     avg: 44574     median: 44573.5 (49%)     max: 45250 Points
min: 20385     avg: 22986     median: 22986 (25%)     max: 25587 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 416.4     avg: 537     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 618     avg: 635     median: 629 (1%)     max: 657 ms
min: 589     avg: 632     median: 645.5 (1%)     max: 647 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
117.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 77142     avg: 87778     median: 89268 (78%)     max: 93476 Points
min: 66039     avg: 68321     median: 68903 (61%)     max: 70020 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 236     avg: 253.7     median: 255.5 (73%)     max: 263 Points
205 Points (59%)
204 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 213     avg: 277.2     median: 278 (58%)     max: 299 Points
min: 248     avg: 259.5     median: 263 (55%)     max: 270 Points
min: 261     avg: 266.5     median: 266.5 (56%)     max: 272 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1366     avg: 1662     median: 1682.5 (64%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1233     avg: 1377     median: 1386 (53%)     max: 1502 Points
min: 1274     avg: 1356     median: 1356 (52%)     max: 1438 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 71.3     median: 65.9 (11%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 36.5     avg: 56.1     median: 59 (10%)     max: 69.4 Watt
min: 35     avg: 48.6     median: 53.2 (9%)     max: 57.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 91     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 43.1     avg: 61.6     median: 62.5 (11%)     max: 80.2 Watt
min: 35     avg: 49.5     median: 50.7 (9%)     max: 62.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.12     avg: 6.6     median: 5.5 (4%)     max: 19.6 Watt
4.8 Watt (3%)
min: 8.39     avg: 9.2     median: 9.2 (6%)     max: 10 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.35     avg: 11     median: 7.5 (8%)     max: 90.3 Watt
min: 5.42     avg: 7.6     median: 7.6 (8%)     max: 9.84 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.7     avg: 31.8     median: 29.1 (22%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 13.3     avg: 16.8     median: 15.8 (12%)     max: 23.6 Points per Watt
min: 16.6     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 22.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-11370H → 70% n=27

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-11390H → 70% n=27

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 15:01:15

#0 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13071 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13167 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719925275 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#8 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.049s ... 0.065s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13071 +0.005s ... 0.069s

#10 got single benchmarks 13071 +0.018s ... 0.087s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13167 +0.004s ... 0.091s

#12 got single benchmarks 13167 +0.008s ... 0.099s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.11s ... 0.209s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.209s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)