Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 125H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 + 2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.5 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island), run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 7-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestwood architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 125H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the 125H features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 125H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 125H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 7-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to overshadow the Radeon 760M; just like the 8-core Arc GPU, this graphics adapter is set to be miles ahead of the aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

The Base power consumption, in the case of the 125H, is 28 W while its maximum Turbo power consumption is supposed to be within 115 W. A powerful cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

This Core Ultra 5 series processor is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U that we are dealing with here. Just like the 7640U, the R5 8640U has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Furthermore, this Ryzen 5 series laptop chip comes with the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640U has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640U is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the chip to be at least 10% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The 8640U has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640U is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 125HAMD Ryzen 5 8640U
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameMeteor Lake-HHawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H compare3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H compare3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H « 3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4500 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 18
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Essen., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUIntel Arc 7-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100 Points (69%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 331     avg: 447.5     median: 447.5 (8%)     max: 564 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9194     avg: 10593     median: 9965 (9%)     max: 12620 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1549     avg: 1638     median: 1655 (70%)     max: 1710 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 633     avg: 648     median: 655 (73%)     max: 655 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3673     avg: 4137     median: 3870 (9%)     max: 4869 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1700     avg: 1848     median: 1702 (11%)     max: 2143 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 236     avg: 243     median: 246 (74%)     max: 247 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 21.9     avg: 24.2     median: 24.2 (31%)     max: 26.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.9     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (73%)     max: 2.98 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9266     avg: 9335     median: 9334.5 (56%)     max: 9403 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 45559     avg: 48467     median: 48466.5 (35%)     max: 51374 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
296.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6103     avg: 9592     median: 9591.5 (15%)     max: 13080 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4663     avg: 4950     median: 5082 (61%)     max: 5106 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
129.6 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
305.3 fps (70%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.7     avg: 11.3     median: 10.6 (19%)     max: 13.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.83     avg: 418.9     median: 418.9 (50%)     max: 837 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.9     avg: 9     median: 9 (23%)     max: 9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 523     avg: 620     median: 667 (8%)     max: 671 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 285     avg: 335.3     median: 357 (3%)     max: 364 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.503     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12498     avg: 13225     median: 13225 (28%)     max: 13952 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.4     avg: 7.5     median: 7.5 (2%)     max: 7.5 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 400.5     avg: 403.6     median: 403.6 (2%)     max: 406.6 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 43778     avg: 54877     median: 54876.5 (48%)     max: 65975 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12766     avg: 14502     median: 13800 (37%)     max: 16940 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72226 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14164 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16291     avg: 18500     median: 17907 (32%)     max: 21301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6216     avg: 7109     median: 6391 (27%)     max: 8721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2258     avg: 2282     median: 2279 (61%)     max: 2310 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 11192     avg: 11439     median: 11555 (46%)     max: 11571 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1630     avg: 1671     median: 1684 (71%)     max: 1699 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9696     avg: 10260     median: 10309 (18%)     max: 10775 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6750 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
38736 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 560     avg: 574     median: 575 (1%)     max: 588 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85765     avg: 86220     median: 86219.5 (76%)     max: 86674 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 237     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (69%)     max: 240 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 245     avg: 252.7     median: 250 (52%)     max: 263 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1548     avg: 1591     median: 1590.5 (61%)     max: 1633 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.3     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 53.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.7     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (11%)     max: 64.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.31     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (3%)     max: 6.35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.71     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (7%)     max: 7.68 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 26.5     avg: 28.3     median: 28.3 (21%)     max: 30 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 125H → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 16:42:03

#0 checking url part for id 16911 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16405 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719758523 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16911 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 16911 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16405 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 16405 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.008s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.023s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.025s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)