Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T770 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A

UNISOC Tangula T770

► remove from comparison  Tangula T770

The Unisoc T770 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

HiSilicon Kirin 710A

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710A

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It is based on the Kirin 710, but manufactured in 14nm FinFET at SMIC (China) versus the TSMC in 12nm. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores (4x Cortex-A73 at up to 2 GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.7 GHz, BigLITTLE), an ARM Mali G51 MP4, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller and a LTE radio (600 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up). Therefore, the CPU part is similar to the Kirin 960 and 970 (both higher clocked), but the graphics card is a lot slower. 

ModelUNISOC Tangula T770HiSilicon Kirin 710A
Series HiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Cortex-A73/-A53
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T820 compare2.1 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 « 2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T765 compare2.1 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T750 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2000 - 2500 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm14 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)ARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 780 MHz)ARM Mali-G51 MP4
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Transistors5500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710A
0.5 pt (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12601     avg: 12741     median: 12740.5 (11%)     max: 12880 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2365     avg: 2426     median: 2411 (28%)     max: 2501 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2441     avg: 2464     median: 2441 (28%)     max: 2511 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
622 Points (26%)
min: 296     avg: 297.3     median: 297 (13%)     max: 299 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2226 Points (4%)
min: 1256     avg: 1300     median: 1312 (2%)     max: 1332 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2763 Points (28%)
min: 1422     avg: 1440     median: 1440 (14%)     max: 1458 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8087 Points (9%)
min: 5211     avg: 5232     median: 5231.5 (6%)     max: 5252 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3221 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3498 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10491 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4894 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6201 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4122     avg: 4267     median: 4266.5 (5%)     max: 4411 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8911     avg: 9454     median: 9453.5 (8%)     max: 9996 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
55 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
37557 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
35829 Points (29%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
26575 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
69743 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
169704 Points (16%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
419246 Points (25%)
182567 Points (11%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
133629 Points (37%)
62687 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7061 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
6622 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3345 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6401 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6287     avg: 7038     median: 7038 (46%)     max: 7789 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7991     avg: 8101     median: 8101 (41%)     max: 8211 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T770 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710A → 52% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 20:46:14

#0 checking url part for id 14025 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12945 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719859574 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.054s ... 0.055s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14025 +0.001s ... 0.055s

#7 got single benchmarks 14025 +0.003s ... 0.058s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12945 +0.003s ... 0.061s

#9 got single benchmarks 12945 +0.005s ... 0.066s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.081s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.083s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)