The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.
Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 127%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 105%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 02. 09:31:40
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719905499 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.006s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.01s ... 0.016s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0.001s ... 0.017s
#10 got single benchmarks 397 +0.009s ... 0.026s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.001s ... 0.027s
#12 got single benchmarks 162 +0.007s ... 0.034s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.051s