The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.
Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 113%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 98%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 02. 09:34:07
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719905644 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.009s ... 0.014s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0.001s ... 0.015s
#10 got single benchmarks 397 +0.009s ... 0.024s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.001s ... 0.024s
#12 got single benchmarks 407 +0.008s ... 0.032s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.046s
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card