The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a low power Core 2 Duo based on the Merom core that was used in the MacBook Air (but due to throttling could not show the full performance).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=5
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 115%n=5
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 → 81%n=5
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 02. 09:38:13
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 382 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719905893 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.005s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.009s ... 0.015s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0.001s ... 0.015s
#10 got single benchmarks 449 +0.008s ... 0.023s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 382 +0.001s ... 0.024s
#12 got single benchmarks 382 +0.003s ... 0.027s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.04s