The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core, but Virtualization (VT-x) functions are disabled.
The P7550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100%n=5
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 115%n=5
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 100%n=5
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 02. 09:22:59
#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719904979 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.007s
#8 got single benchmarks 164 +0.01s ... 0.018s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0.001s ... 0.018s
#10 got single benchmarks 449 +0.009s ... 0.027s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0.001s ... 0.028s
#12 got single benchmarks 410 +0.013s ... 0.041s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.059s
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card