Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

Intel Core 2 Duo T7400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 is a CULV laptop processor for small and light laptops. Due to the small clock speed, the CPU is specified with a TDP of only 10 Watt. For non demanding tasks, the performance of both cores is sufficient. Many laptops with the SU7300 feature an overclocking option to run the CPU at higher clock rates (e.g. 1.7 GHz in the Asus UL series). Compared to the Atom series, the SU7300 is signifantly faster.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7400Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 « 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2160 MHz1300 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache4 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt10 Watt
Transistors291 Million410 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V45 nm
Die Size143 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478BGA956
Architecturex86x86
$286 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXT

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
208 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
84 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 149     avg: 154.5     median: 154.5 (0%)     max: 160 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 72     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (0%)     max: 72.4 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 38.39     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (12%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 869     avg: 1462     median: 1496 (9%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1642     avg: 2777     median: 2813 (2%)     max: 3181 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 3020     avg: 3045     median: 3045.5 (2%)     max: 3067 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1501     avg: 1576     median: 1586 (2%)     max: 1629 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2029     avg: 3417     median: 3615 (43%)     max: 4608 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 37.2     avg: 67.6     median: 61.3 (12%)     max: 118.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
885 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2492     avg: 2515     median: 2514.5 (1%)     max: 2537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1445     avg: 1450     median: 1450 (17%)     max: 1455 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.5 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 SU7300 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 SU7300 +
8394 Seconds (59%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2.84     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (62%)     max: 2.86 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1633     avg: 1817     median: 1861 (4%)     max: 1895 Points
min: 1078     avg: 1167     median: 1178 (3%)     max: 1229 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7400 +
257 Points (99%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 25 s
min: 22     avg: 34.2     median: 37.2 (8%)     max: 38 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 58     avg: 59.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 62 s
min: 54     avg: 78     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1523     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (7%)     max: 1539 s
min: 1341     avg: 1830     median: 2059 (9%)     max: 2091 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 13249     avg: 18264     median: 18263.5 (9%)     max: 23278 MIPS
min: 10480     avg: 11679     median: 11968.5 (6%)     max: 12300 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 9696     avg: 12732     median: 12732 (10%)     max: 15768 MFLOPS
min: 8790     avg: 9118     median: 8911 (7%)     max: 9860 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7400 +
683 Points (47%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7400 +
2230 Points (92%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7400 +
2080 Points (94%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7400 +
min: 7174     avg: 7329     median: 7376 (99%)     max: 7438 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3716     avg: 4445     median: 4683 (10%)     max: 4859 Points
min: 2440     avg: 2819     median: 2819 (6%)     max: 3198 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.2 Points (60%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.1 Points (53%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2303     avg: 2494     median: 2579 (2%)     max: 2600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
11926 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
983 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
207 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1024 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1707 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1536 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
855 Points (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 79% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 10:40:22

#0 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 503 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720082422 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 164 +0.01s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 503 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 503 +0.02s ... 0.037s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.041s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.044s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.045s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.046s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.016s ... 0.061s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.062s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.062s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.063s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)