Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Intel Core i5-3320M

Intel Core 2 Duo T6600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 is an entry to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn architecture, but features only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz. Compared to the similar T6670, the T6600 does not feature Virtualization features in hardware and is speced at a lower maximum temperature.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6600.

Intel Core i5-3320M

► remove from comparison Intel 3320M

The Intel Core i5-3320M is a fast dual-core processor for laptops based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.6 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.1 GHz (for 2 active cores) and 3.3 GHz (for 1 active core). As its Sandy-Bridge-based predecessor Core i5-2520M, it offers a 3 MB L3-Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of the Core i5-3320M is slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to the architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance is similar to the old i7-2640M.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 offers 16 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1200 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it one of the faster variants.

Just like most other Ivy Bridge dual-cores, the i5-3320M is rated at a TDP of 35 W. Therefore, even smaller laptops can use the Core i5.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6600Intel Core i5-3320M
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core i5
CodenamePenrynIvy Bridge
Series: Core i5 Ivy Bridge
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i5-3380M compare2.9 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3360M compare2.8 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3340M compare2.7 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3320M « 2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3230M compare2.6 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3210M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3437U compare1.9 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3427U compare1.8 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3337U compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3317U compare1.7 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3439Y compare1.5 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-3339Y compare1.5 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2200 MHz2600 - 3300 MHz
FSB800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.00-1.25V22 nm
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, SSE4.1HD Graphics 4000 (650-1200MHz), DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache3 MB
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 - 1200 MHz)
$225 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 3320M +
min: 3.04     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (4%)     max: 3.1 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 3320M +
min: 1.31     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (33%)     max: 1.35 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2308     avg: 2391     median: 2355 (14%)     max: 2631 Points
min: 4292     avg: 4407     median: 4415.5 (27%)     max: 4465 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4335     avg: 4525     median: 4472 (3%)     max: 4833 Points
min: 9473     avg: 9554     median: 9550 (7%)     max: 9683 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 4229     avg: 4727     median: 4864.5 (3%)     max: 4948 Points
min: 11505     avg: 11699     median: 11667 (8%)     max: 11913 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2257     avg: 2454     median: 2463 (3%)     max: 2633 Points
min: 5380     avg: 5561     median: 5588 (7%)     max: 5646 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1190     avg: 2015     median: 2269 (27%)     max: 2331 s
min: 499.2     avg: 537     median: 540 (6%)     max: 557 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37     avg: 63.1     median: 71.1 (14%)     max: 73.3 s
min: 15.85     avg: 17.6     median: 17.4 (3%)     max: 20.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 3320M +
min: 2522     avg: 2915     median: 2707 (4%)     max: 3361 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 3320M +
min: 16.9     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (6%)     max: 17.74 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 3320M +
min: 86.8     avg: 91     median: 91 (21%)     max: 94 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 3320M +
min: 0.1572     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.161 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 3320M +
min: 0.267     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.276 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 3320M +
min: 0.2988     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (4%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1852     avg: 1942     median: 1947 (4%)     max: 1989 Points
min: 3727     avg: 3770     median: 3767 (8%)     max: 3808 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (5%)     max: 24 s
min: 11     avg: 13.2     median: 11.9 (3%)     max: 28.84 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 59     median: 60.5 (3%)     max: 61 s
min: 26     avg: 30     median: 27 (1%)     max: 58.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1322     avg: 1334     median: 1334.5 (6%)     max: 1343 s
min: 611     avg: 678     median: 636 (3%)     max: 1122 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 20109     avg: 20199     median: 20216 (10%)     max: 20254 MIPS
min: 53130     avg: 57674     median: 57480 (27%)     max: 62610 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 14760     avg: 15060     median: 15119.5 (12%)     max: 15241 MFLOPS
min: 37700     avg: 38286     median: 37920 (29%)     max: 39380 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6600 +
min: 3511     avg: 4691     median: 4746.5 (10%)     max: 5758 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 5.6     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (73%)     max: 5.7 Points
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (92%)     max: 7.2 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 4198     avg: 4217     median: 4216.5 (4%)     max: 4235 Points
min: 9831     avg: 10105     median: 10094.5 (9%)     max: 10559 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 3320M +
min: 3138     avg: 3571     median: 3501 (9%)     max: 4041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 3320M +
min: 24617     avg: 27316     median: 27316 (22%)     max: 30015 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 3320M +
min: 2720     avg: 2721     median: 2721 (7%)     max: 2722 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 3320M +
min: 4040     avg: 4064     median: 4063.5 (7%)     max: 4087 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-3320M → 179% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 20:03:21

#0 checking url part for id 485 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3076 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720116201 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 485 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 485 +0.015s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3076 +0s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 3076 +0.006s ... 0.026s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.041s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)