Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T619 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

UNISOC T619

► remove from comparison  T619

The Unisoc Tiger T619 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 2.2 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 or 2 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes an LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), a LPDDR4x 1866 MHz memory controller and an ARM Mali G57MP1 GPU (850 MHz max) and a dual core ISP (24 and 8 MPixel support). The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET. 

Compared to the T616, the T619 offers 200 MHz higher clocked A75 cores and a 100 MHz higher clocked GPU.

HiSilicon Kirin 9000W

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000W

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000W is an SoC that can be used in smartphones and tablets based on Android and was first installed in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2.

Huawei does not reveal any information about the SoC. The little information that is available comes from benchmarks and system analysis tools. The CPU consists of three clusters with a total of 12 cores. The power-saving cluster has four ARM Cortex-A510 cores, each operating at up to 1,530 MHz, while six other cores use unspecified cores from HiSilicon (0x0D42) and clock at up to 2,150 MHz. The third cluster contains two HiSilicon cores (0x0D02), each with a maximum clock speed of 2,487 MHz. The performance cores could possibly be based on the TaiShan V120 architecture (as in the Kirin 9000S).

The single-core performance is correspondingly mixed, but the multi-core performance is at the level of a high-end SoC from 2022 due to the numerous cores.

A Maleoon 910 by HiSilicon is integrated as the graphics unit, similar to the 9000S (where it was clocked with up to 750MHz).

Nothing concrete is known about the manufacturing process or the architecture. The SoC will probably be manufactured in 7 nm at SMIC.

ModelUNISOC T619HiSilicon Kirin 9000W
Series
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55
Series:
UNISOC T619 « 1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
newitem compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W « 1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST comparecores
unknown compare cores
Clock1800 - 2200 MHz1530 - 2490 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 812 / 12
2 x 2.5 GHz
6 x 2.2 GHz
4 x 1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Technology12 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (850 MHz)HiSilicon Maleoon 910
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5690 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5614 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1174 Points (32%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4088 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T619 +
403 Points (17%)
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T619 +
1489 Points (3%)
3878 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4712 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
13978 Points (15%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1202 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
203.8 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
33982 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
99 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T619 +
46931 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T619 +
76849 Points (62%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T619 +
32843 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T619 +
78585 Points (28%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T619 +
235208 Points (23%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
T619 +
273781 Points (17%)
655341 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
T619 +
76619 Points (21%)
182634 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
110.5 MB/s (81%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1435 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
63.2 MB/s (78%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1522 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
45015 Points (71%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
10620 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
834 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
8.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T619 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000W → 238% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 08:21:31

#0 checking url part for id 15071 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17388 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719728491 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.056s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15071 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#7 got single benchmarks 15071 +0.003s ... 0.06s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17388 +0.001s ... 0.061s

#9 got single benchmarks 17388 +0.003s ... 0.064s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.082s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)