Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Intel Celeron N4120

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

► remove from comparison Intel T4500

The Intel Pentium T4500 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4500 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4500.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4500 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4500 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4500 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Celeron N4120

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4120

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Compared to the predecessor, the Celeron N4100, the refresh offers a 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4120 in our database is not much faster than AMD's Zen-based, affordable Athlon Silver 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the Intel Celeron 6305 and the Core i5-7Y54 found close nearby as well. It's a very basic CPU that we're talking about here. While it does have four cores, these are some seriously slow cores, dashing hopes of anybody looking to get a Core i3-like performance for cheap.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, Celeron N4120 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a good option for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs. It's manufactured on a very old (as of late 2022) 14 nm process, though, making for poor energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T4500Intel Celeron N4120
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Gemini Lake
CodenamePenrynGemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2300 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
FSB800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP35 Watt6 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.05-1.15V14 nm
Die Size107 mm2
SocketPGA478BGA1090
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4120
17.4 pt (24%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 965     avg: 1149     median: 1230 (1%)     max: 1253 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 409     avg: 416.5     median: 416.5 (18%)     max: 424 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 159     avg: 163.3     median: 165 (18%)     max: 166 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 376     avg: 460.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 516 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 223     avg: 227     median: 224 (1%)     max: 234 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 73     avg: 73.6     median: 73.2 (22%)     max: 74.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.3 Points (2%)
2.7 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2234     avg: 2315     median: 2331 (14%)     max: 2367 Points
2159 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4283     avg: 4366     median: 4337 (3%)     max: 4490 Points
6432 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 4458     avg: 4594     median: 4578 (3%)     max: 4747 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 2388     avg: 2447     median: 2416 (3%)     max: 2538 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1137     avg: 1142     median: 1137 (13%)     max: 1152 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.7     avg: 35.9     median: 35.7 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
17.6 s (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 5832     avg: 6817     median: 7184 (4%)     max: 7436 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2145     avg: 2279     median: 2279 (27%)     max: 2412 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.02     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2558     avg: 2571     median: 2570.5 (18%)     max: 2583 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.642     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (36%)     max: 1.649 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1887     avg: 1920     median: 1898 (4%)     max: 1995 Points
3403 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.6     median: 25.6 (6%)     max: 26.2 s
25.6 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 62.9     median: 62.9 (3%)     max: 63.8 s
58.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T4500 +
1502 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T4500 +
21100 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T4500 +
15460 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 3747     avg: 3865     median: 3865 (8%)     max: 3983 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T4500 +
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2626     avg: 2669     median: 2668.5 (7%)     max: 2711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2251     avg: 2348     median: 2373 (6%)     max: 2421 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3496     avg: 3723     median: 3688 (7%)     max: 3984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 909     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (4%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 438     avg: 442     median: 439 (19%)     max: 449 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1505     avg: 1525     median: 1509 (3%)     max: 1561 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 435     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (2%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1492     avg: 1503     median: 1503 (5%)     max: 1514 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1864     avg: 1885     median: 1876 (19%)     max: 1915 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5477     avg: 5606     median: 5668 (6%)     max: 5674 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2125     avg: 2308     median: 2345.5 (3%)     max: 2415 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
520 ms (6%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16865     avg: 17701     median: 17701 (16%)     max: 18537 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 85     avg: 90.9     median: 86.2 (18%)     max: 106 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 3.0 Battery Life
383 min (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28061 Points (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8969 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.3 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
28.4 Points per Watt (21%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4120 → 131% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 10:59:09

#0 checking url part for id 593 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11533 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720083548 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 593 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 593 +0.009s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11533 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 11533 +0.007s ... 0.026s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)