Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Intel Celeron J4025

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

► remove from comparison Intel T4500

The Intel Pentium T4500 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4500 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4500.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4500 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4500 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4500 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T4500Intel Celeron J4025
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Gemini Lake
CodenamePenrynGemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2300 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
FSB800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.05-1.15V14 nm
Die Size107 mm2
SocketPGA478FCBGA1090
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.9 pt (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
178 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
293 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
148 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.3 Points (2%)
1.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2234     avg: 2315     median: 2331 (14%)     max: 2367 Points
2337 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4283     avg: 4366     median: 4337 (3%)     max: 4490 Points
4556 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 4458     avg: 4594     median: 4578 (3%)     max: 4747 Points
7049 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2388     avg: 2447     median: 2416 (3%)     max: 2538 Points
3920 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1137     avg: 1142     median: 1137 (13%)     max: 1152 s
983 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.7     avg: 35.9     median: 35.7 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
31.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
783 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
4955 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2636 MIPS (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.1 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3792 Seconds (27%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (31%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1887     avg: 1920     median: 1898 (4%)     max: 1995 Points
2575 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.6     median: 25.6 (6%)     max: 26.2 s
23.1 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 62.9     median: 62.9 (3%)     max: 63.8 s
51.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1502 s (7%)
1176 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T4500 +
21100 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T4500 +
15460 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 3747     avg: 3865     median: 3865 (8%)     max: 3983 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T4500 +
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4284 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41689 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41654 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3720 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5474 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
500 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
927 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2151 ms (3%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
89.2 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 119% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 11:18:29

#0 checking url part for id 593 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719739109 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 593 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 593 +0.011s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.055s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)