Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that is rumored to debut some time in H2 2024. The X1P-42-100 is thought to have 8 Oryon CPU cores (8 threads) running at a not yet known clock speed of at least 3.0 GHz. As far as other key features are concerned, the X Plus probably comes with the same 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller that its bigger and smarter brother, the X1P-64-100, employs.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s. A 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads is most likely included.

This X Plus chip does not make use of the same die that the X1P-64-100, X1E-78-100, X1E-80-100, X1E-84-100 are based on.

Performance

The faster X1P-64-100 (10 CPU cores running at higher clock speeds) is about as fast as the Intel Core i7-13700H and the 9-core Apple M4 are in multi-thread workloads. This means the X1P-42-100 will most likely be about as fast as the Intel Core i7-12650H and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H which is not bad at all for what is supposedly an almost budget CPU.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming; while slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1P-42-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
CodenameOryonOryon
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « 8 / 8 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
Technology4 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
Clock <=3400 MHz
TDP35 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2454 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 14114     avg: 14296     median: 14323.5 (56%)     max: 14422 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 454.4     avg: 760     median: 759.7 (1%)     max: 1065 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
79579 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 114.2     avg: 199.6     median: 199.6 (57%)     max: 285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134.1     avg: 276.6     median: 276.6 (58%)     max: 419 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.3 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 20:21:28

#0 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719685288 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 17591 +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.036s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)