Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 vs Apple M3

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that is rumored to debut some time in H2 2024. The X1P-42-100 is thought to have 8 Oryon CPU cores (8 threads) running at a not yet known clock speed of at least 3.0 GHz. As far as other key features are concerned, the X Plus probably comes with the same 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU, 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller that its bigger and smarter brother, the X1P-64-100, employs.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if it is is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s. A 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads is most likely included.

This X Plus chip does not make use of the same die that the X1P-64-100, X1E-78-100, X1E-80-100, X1E-84-100 are based on.

Performance

The faster X1P-64-100 (10 CPU cores running at higher clock speeds) is about as fast as the Intel Core i7-13700H and the 9-core Apple M4 are in multi-thread workloads. This means the X1P-42-100 will most likely be about as fast as the Intel Core i7-12650H and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H which is not bad at all for what is supposedly an almost budget CPU.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming; while slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno is not fast enough to outpace the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1P-42-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Apple M3

► remove from comparison Apple M3

The Apple M3 is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced in late 2023. It integrates a new 8-core CPU with 4 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores running at up to 2.75 GHz. Apple claims that the CPU is up to 20% faster than in the old Apple M2 (3.5 GHz)

Due to the higher clock speeds and architecture improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 in benchmarks (see e.g. Geekbench below) and can keep up with the fastest CPUs in short single-core tests (like the Raptor Lake i9-13950HX).

The M3 also integrates a new graphics adapter with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration. According to Apple, it is 20% faster than the GPU in the M2. The chip integrates again 10 GPU cores, but the cheaper variant only offers 8 cores (e.g. in the entry iMac). Furthermore, the GPU only supports 2 displays (an additional 6K60 display to the internal one).

Both GPU and CPU can access the unified memory on the package together. It is still available in 8, 16 and 24 GB variants and offers the same 100 GB/s maximum bandwidth (unlike the Pro models that feature a reduced memory bandwidth). 

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (versus 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded.

Unfortunately, the integrated wireless network module only supports Wi-Fi 6E (no Wi-Fi 7) and due to the support of only a single external monitor, the chip also has to make do with no Thunderbolt 4 (Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4 support only for up to 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured on the current 3nm TSMC process (N3B most likely) and contains 25 billion transistors (+25% vs. Apple M2). The 3nm process should also contribute to the excellent efficiency of the chip. Under load, the M3 CPU consumes approximately 20 Watt.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100Apple M3
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XApple Apple M3
CodenameOryon
Series: Apple M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 compare - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « 8 / 8 cores Oryon
Apple M3 Max 16-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core compare2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M3 « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x Qualcomm Oryon
8 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
Technology4 nm3 nm
iGPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Apple M3 10-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.apple.com
Clock2748 - 4056 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Transistors25000 Million
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction Set

Benchmarks

Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 140     avg: 141     median: 141 (98%)     max: 142 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 576     avg: 622     median: 599.5 (11%)     max: 712 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 10074     avg: 10275     median: 10298 (10%)     max: 10454 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 1900     avg: 1901     median: 1900 (81%)     max: 1904 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 M3 +
504 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 M3 +
2818 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M3 +
1499 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 M3 +
271 Points (82%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 491     avg: 590     median: 517 (7%)     max: 761 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 474     avg: 509     median: 494 (3%)     max: 558 Seconds
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 3026     avg: 3077     median: 3076 (83%)     max: 3130 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 11863     avg: 11984     median: 11992 (47%)     max: 12066 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 2256     avg: 2316     median: 2342 (99%)     max: 2350 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 M3 +
min: 10570     avg: 10697     median: 10748 (19%)     max: 10774 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 362.8     avg: 366.4     median: 363.1 (0%)     max: 373.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 M3 +
min: 96622     avg: 97216     median: 96933 (85%)     max: 98093 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M3 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (90%)     max: 315 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 M3 +
min: 423     avg: 438.7     median: 445 (93%)     max: 448 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M3 +
min: 1847     avg: 1850     median: 1847 (71%)     max: 1857 Points
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 2.63     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 2.87 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M3 +
min: 3.94     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.7 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 00:45:38

#0 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15110 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720046738 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 17591 +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15110 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 15110 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.025s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)