Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Intel Core i7-1255U

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1255U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1255U

The Intel Core i7-1255U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.7 to 4.7 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.2 to 3.5 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i7-1265U (fastest U-series CPU at launch), the 1255 offers 100 MHz lower clocked CPU cores and only "Essentials" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

The average 1255U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 5600U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which is nothing to be ashamed of, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 28 W, the Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1255U that we know of. It can be 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Architecture

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 12 W. Its Base power consumption sits at 15 W and its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to exceed 55 W. All those values are too high to allow for pasisvely cooled designs.

Last but not the least, Core i7-1255U is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Intel Core i7-1255U
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XIntel Alder Lake-M
CodenameOryonAlder Lake-U
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 compare8 / 8 cores Oryon
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U « 1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock <=3400 MHz1200 - 4700 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
10 / 12
TDP35 Watt15 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
iGPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache928 KB
L2 Cache9.5 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1255U
37.8 pt (52%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
min: 5269     avg: 7996     median: 8308.5 (8%)     max: 9628 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
min: 1408     avg: 1625     median: 1650 (70%)     max: 1775 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
min: 550     avg: 634     median: 636.5 (71%)     max: 682 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
min: 2095     avg: 3044     median: 3059 (7%)     max: 3702 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
min: 919     avg: 1330     median: 1388.5 (9%)     max: 1577 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
min: 161     avg: 229.4     median: 238 (72%)     max: 251 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
min: 24126     avg: 33261     median: 36691 (21%)     max: 37365 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
min: 5059     avg: 5284     median: 5247.5 (63%)     max: 5529 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
min: 6.31     avg: 9     median: 9.7 (17%)     max: 10.1 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
min: 683     avg: 795     median: 726 (9%)     max: 1156 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
min: 372     avg: 430.4     median: 395.5 (3%)     max: 601 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
min: 0.4688     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.558 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
min: 8097     avg: 13846     median: 14909.5 (40%)     max: 16890 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
min: 7134     avg: 10021     median: 10299.5 (26%)     max: 12522 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
min: 11482     avg: 16957     median: 17834.5 (32%)     max: 20193 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
min: 1124     avg: 5303     median: 6067 (26%)     max: 7649 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2354     avg: 2404     median: 2404 (65%)     max: 2454 Points
2313 Points (62%)
7914 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1644     median: 1661 (70%)     max: 1712 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
min: 4463     avg: 7283     median: 7982 (14%)     max: 8821 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1523     avg: 1608     median: 1612 (7%)     max: 1684 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4557     avg: 6901     median: 6905 (22%)     max: 8452 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 454.4     avg: 457.1     median: 457.1 (1%)     max: 459.8 ms
min: 476.2     avg: 585     median: 571 (1%)     max: 727 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
97.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
79579 Points (70%)
min: 75963     avg: 82625     median: 82948 (73%)     max: 88687 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 285     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (82%)     max: 286 Points
min: 183.4     avg: 230.5     median: 233 (67%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 395     avg: 407     median: 407 (85%)     max: 419 Points
min: 200     avg: 274.6     median: 275 (57%)     max: 366 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
9895 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
11617 Points (54%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
min: 1329     avg: 1454     median: 1464.5 (56%)     max: 1573 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
173 Points (96%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
min: 24.3     avg: 42.3     median: 42.2 (7%)     max: 51.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.3 Watt (12%)
min: 27.8     avg: 54.9     median: 54.5 (10%)     max: 75.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
min: 4.09     avg: 6.2     median: 5.6 (4%)     max: 11.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt
min: 3.55     avg: 9     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 30.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.7     avg: 25     median: 24.8 (18%)     max: 33.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1255U → 102% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 19:44:38

#0 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14074 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720115078 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14074 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 14074 +0.021s ... 0.041s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.075s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)