Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Apple M3

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Apple M3 Max 14-Core

► remove from comparison Apple Apple M3 Max 14-Core

The Apple M3 Max 14 core CPU is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced towards the end of 2023. It integrates a new 14-core CPU with 10 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores with 2.8 GHz. There is also a more powerful 16-core variant with 40 GPU cores.

Thanks to the higher clock rates and architectural improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 Max in benchmarks and can keep up with the fastest mobile CPUs.

The M3 also integrates a new graphics card with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration via hardware. In the cheaper model, 30 of the chip's 40 cores are used and support up to 5 displays simultaneously (internal and 4 external).

GPU and CPU can jointly access the shared memory on the package (unified memory). This is available in 36 and 96 GB variants and offers 400 GB/s maximum bandwidth (512 bit bus).

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (compared to 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now also supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded. Like its predecessor, the Max chip offers two video engines and can therefore encode and decode two streams simultaneously.

Unfortunately, the integrated WLAN only continues to support WiFi 6E (no WiFi 7), unlike the small M3 SoC thunderbolt 4 is also supported (max 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured in the current 3nm process (N3B) at TSMC and contains 92 billion transistors (+37% vs. Apple M2 Max).

Apple M3

► remove from comparison Apple M3

The Apple M3 is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple for notebooks that was introduced in late 2023. It integrates a new 8-core CPU with 4 performance cores with up to 4.06 GHz and 4 efficiency cores running at up to 2.75 GHz. Apple claims that the CPU is up to 20% faster than in the old Apple M2 (3.5 GHz)

Due to the higher clock speeds and architecture improvements, the processor performance is also significantly better than the M2 in benchmarks (see e.g. Geekbench below) and can keep up with the fastest CPUs in short single-core tests (like the Raptor Lake i9-13950HX).

The M3 also integrates a new graphics adapter with dynamic caching, mesh shading and ray tracing acceleration. According to Apple, it is 20% faster than the GPU in the M2. The chip integrates again 10 GPU cores, but the cheaper variant only offers 8 cores (e.g. in the entry iMac). Furthermore, the GPU only supports 2 displays (an additional 6K60 display to the internal one).

Both GPU and CPU can access the unified memory on the package together. It is still available in 8, 16 and 24 GB variants and offers the same 100 GB/s maximum bandwidth (unlike the Pro models that feature a reduced memory bandwidth). 

The integrated 16-core Neural Engine has also been revised and now offers 18 TOPS peak performance (versus 15.8 TOPS in the M2 but 35 TOPS in the new A17 Pro). The video engine now supports AV1 decoding in hardware. H.264, HEVC and ProRes (RAW) can still be decoded and encoded.

Unfortunately, the integrated wireless network module only supports Wi-Fi 6E (no Wi-Fi 7) and due to the support of only a single external monitor, the chip also has to make do with no Thunderbolt 4 (Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4 support only for up to 40 Gbit/s).

The chip is manufactured on the current 3nm TSMC process (N3B most likely) and contains 25 billion transistors (+25% vs. Apple M2). The 3nm process should also contribute to the excellent efficiency of the chip. Under load, the M3 CPU consumes approximately 20 Watt.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Apple M3 Max 14-CoreApple M3
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XApple Apple M3Apple Apple M3
CodenameOryon
Series: Apple M3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Apple M3 Max 16-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M32.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Apple M3 Max 16-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz16 / 16 cores
Apple M3 Max 14-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz14 / 14 cores
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz12 / 12 cores
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core2.75 - 4.06 GHz11 / 11 cores
Apple M3 « 2.75 - 4.06 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock <=3400 MHz2748 - 4056 MHz2748 - 4056 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
14 / 14
10 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
8 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core
4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core
TDP35 Watt78 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt
Technology4 nm3 nm3 nm
iGPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.apple.comwww.apple.com
Transistors92000 Million25000 Million
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
L2 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
134%
1 M3 +
min: 140     avg: 141     median: 141 (98%)     max: 142 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
63%
1 M3 +
min: 576     avg: 622     median: 599.5 (11%)     max: 712 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
94%
1 M3 +
min: 10074     avg: 10275     median: 10298 (10%)     max: 10454 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
170%
1 M3 +
min: 1900     avg: 1901     median: 1900 (81%)     max: 1904 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
121%
1 M3 +
504 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
69%
1 M3 +
2818 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
72%
1 M3 +
1499 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
130%
1 M3 +
271 Points (82%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
101%
1 M3 +
min: 491     avg: 590     median: 517 (7%)     max: 761 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
99%
1 M3 +
min: 474     avg: 509     median: 494 (3%)     max: 558 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2454 Points (66%)
125%
1 M3 +
min: 3026     avg: 3077     median: 3076 (83%)     max: 3130 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 14114     avg: 14296     median: 14323.5 (56%)     max: 14422 Points
84%
1 M3 +
min: 11863     avg: 11984     median: 11992 (47%)     max: 12066 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
135%
1 M3 +
min: 2256     avg: 2316     median: 2342 (99%)     max: 2350 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
118%
1 M3 +
min: 10570     avg: 10697     median: 10748 (19%)     max: 10774 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 454.4     avg: 760     median: 759.7 (1%)     max: 1065 ms
100%
1 M3 +
min: 362.8     avg: 366.4     median: 363.1 (0%)     max: 373.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
79579 Points (70%)
122%
1 M3 +
min: 96622     avg: 97216     median: 96933 (85%)     max: 98093 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 114.2     avg: 199.6     median: 199.6 (57%)     max: 285 Points
157%
1 M3 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (90%)     max: 315 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134.1     avg: 276.6     median: 276.6 (58%)     max: 419 Points
161%
1 M3 +
min: 423     avg: 438.7     median: 445 (93%)     max: 448 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
184%
1 M3 +
min: 1847     avg: 1850     median: 1847 (71%)     max: 1857 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.3 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
100%
1 M3 +
min: 2.63     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (2%)     max: 2.87 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt
101%
1 M3 +
min: 3.94     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.7 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Apple M3 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 00:51:53

#0 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16356 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15110 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719787912 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#8 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16356 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 16356 +0s ... 0.021s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15110 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#12 got single benchmarks 15110 +0.006s ... 0.028s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.053s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)