Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core i5-560M vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.

Intel Core i5-560M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-560M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 3.2 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i7-580M, the 560M a slightly lower maximum Turbo Boost frequency.

A feature of the new Core i5-560M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-560M should be a bit beyond the Core i7-620M and therefore the second fastest dual core CPU for laptops in 2010. Compared to the older Core 2 Duo models, the i5-560M should be faster than the T9900. Therefore, the Core i5-560M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 is a low power laptop processor for small and slim laptops. It features the full 6 MB level 2 cache and all features of the Penryn core (e.g. VT-x and Trusted Execution). Due to the large cache, the CPU shows a good performance for the small clock rate. However, in the MacBook Air, the CPU throttled very often, leading to the slower benchmarks in our database.

Compared to other Core 2 Duo models, the C2D SL9600 only supports the socket BGA956 and is soldered in the MacBook Air models.

 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core i5-560MIntel Core 2 Duo SL9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core i5Intel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynArrandalePenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 « 1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M « 2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 « 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1860 MHz2667 - 3200 MHz2130 MHz
FSB106625001066
L2 Cache6 MB512 KB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 42 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million382+177 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.050V - 1.150V32 nm45 nm, 1.05-1.15
Die Size107 mm281+114 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956PGA988BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, Dual Channel DDR3 memory controllerEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT, Intel64
Architecturex86x86x86
$284 U.S.$225 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L3 Cache3 MB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (1%)
215%
1 560M +
min: 2.36     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.42 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (13%)     max: 2205 Points
154%
560M +
min: 3263     avg: 3346     median: 3306 (20%)     max: 3486 Points
2054 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (3%)     max: 3864 Points
194%
560M +
min: 7411     avg: 7487     median: 7466 (5%)     max: 7592 Points
3281 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 560M +
min: 8593     avg: 8869     median: 8877.5 (6%)     max: 9127 Points
54%
1 SL9600 +
4815 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 560M +
min: 4001     avg: 4112     median: 4090 (5%)     max: 4268 Points
67%
1 SL9600 +
2726 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1329     avg: 1355     median: 1354.5 (16%)     max: 1380 s
111%
560M +
min: 536     avg: 555     median: 542.5 (6%)     max: 600 s
min: 1163     avg: 1436     median: 1435.5 (17%)     max: 1708 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 41.93     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
106%
560M +
min: 17     avg: 17.9     median: 17.7 (4%)     max: 19.34 s
min: 38     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 48.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
240%
1 560M +
min: 3061     avg: 3104     median: 3115.5 (7%)     max: 3122 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
102%
560M +
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.2 (3%)     max: 15 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
101%
560M +
min: 33     avg: 35     median: 35.6 (2%)     max: 36.44 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
103%
560M +
min: 789     avg: 804     median: 806 (4%)     max: 825 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
93%
1 SL9600 +
min: 12450     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (8%)     max: 19521 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
97%
1 SL9600 +
min: 11830     avg: 13238     median: 13237.5 (10%)     max: 14645 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (9%)     max: 4395 Points
167%
1 560M +
min: 6475     avg: 6964     median: 6964 (14%)     max: 7453 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9400 +
4.8 Points (69%)
106%
1 SL9600 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
128%
1 560M +
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (87%)     max: 6.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SL9400 +
3809 Points (3%)
216%
1 560M +
min: 8234     avg: 8243     median: 8242.5 (7%)     max: 8251 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-560M → 124% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 → 97% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 21:11:19

#0 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1266 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 516 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719861079 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 422 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1266 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 1266 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 516 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#12 got single benchmarks 516 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.042s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)